Laserfiche WebLink
Special City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,June 1, 2015 <br /> Page 16 <br /> some recommendations to offer, Mr. Trudgeon noted it would be up to the City <br /> Council as a whole to determine the best approach for use of this one-time mon- <br /> ey. <br /> Councilmember McGehee agreed with the comments of Mayor Roe about all four <br /> corners in SE Roseville being considered. However, Councilmember McGehee <br /> also noted the limitations of staff time, particularly that of the City Manager and <br /> Community Development Director and additional efforts in orchestrating interac- <br /> tion and planning across jurisdictions. In order to do things right, Councilmember <br /> McGehee opined it may be necessary to seek outside assistance in those efforts. <br /> c. Public Works Department Budget Presentation <br /> Public Works Director Marc Culver briefly summarized the priorities and chal- <br /> lenges he saw for the 2016 budget as outlined in his written report. Mr. Culver <br /> highlighted the recent department reorganization and addition of one FTE, as ap- <br /> proved by the City Council earlier this year and building on the initiatives imple- <br /> mented by former Director Duane Schwartz and in succession planning efforts. <br /> Mr. Culver thanked the City Council for their support of these endeavors, allow- <br /> ing a needed shift as staff retirements were taken advantage of and shifting con- <br /> centration to management and asset management support, along with hiring an <br /> outside firm for facility maintenance versus in-house staffing. Due to the work of <br /> former Director Schwartz, Mr. Culver advised that he was seeking no additional <br /> increases in staffing for 2016, opining that the department was in a good place in <br /> the short-term. <br /> Mr. Culver noted increased maintenance costs as the Pavement Management Pro- <br /> gram (PMP) funding was shifted from sealcoating to mill and overlay, and the po- <br /> tential for additional costs for short-term maintenance based on delamination is- <br /> sues, and more time and money spent on patching. Mr. Culver advised that he an- <br /> ticipated increases in material costs with his proposed budget submitted to City <br /> Manager Trudgeon showing a slight increase accordingly, and alerting the City <br /> Council to potential risks with those cost projections in 2016. <br /> Mr. Culver advised that he also anticipated some increases in infrastructure re- <br /> placement and management costs due to experiences in higher bids coming in for <br /> Roseville as well as its colleagues, even though long-term CIP projections had <br /> positioned the enterprise funds well to assist in those endeavors. However, Mr. <br /> Culver suggested there may be a need to adjust the CIP and enterprise funds ac- <br /> cordingly, as well as the street maintenance fund supported from the general fund <br /> levy. Mr. Culver noted that this current bidding climate impacted smaller con- <br /> tracts as well (e.g. patching, sidewalk installations, and water main breaks). <br /> Mr. Culver noted that, while increased pathways were always good as requested <br /> by citizens, it also created a need to address those additional maintenance costs. <br /> Based on that, Mr. Culver noted the need to revisit how that was annually funded <br />