Laserfiche WebLink
399 Regarding new construction, Member Cihacek asked if other municipalities were <br />400 equally strict, or how Roseville's requirements compared to them (e.g. the recent <br />401 Wal-Mart development). <br />402 <br />403 Specific to the Wal-Mart development as an example, Mr. Culver advised that they <br />404 actually built their stormwater management system to a higher level than required, <br />405 and thereby earned extra credits. Mr. Culver stated he was unsure how Roseville's <br />406 requirements compared to other jurisdictions or if they were on an average level. <br />407 <br />408 Mr. Johnson duly noted the requested information, and offered to research that and <br />409 report back to the PWETC. <br />410 <br />411 Chair Stenlund noted his amazement at whatsomechurches are doing in the <br />412 community to address stormwater management. Since this is a voluntary program <br />413 when no permit is required for retrofitting, Chair Stenlund suggested alerting the <br />414 public to the options available beyond raingardens or rain barrels. Using one <br />415 church and their installation of an interception system before any requirements, <br />416 Chair Stenlund noted that they had done so volun Chair Stenlund opined that <br />417 people don't necessarily know what they can do, a the options available to them, <br />418 such as addressing issues along Langton Lake that may be simple but still make a <br />419 huge impact. ""iilllllliiiiiiullllllllllll,. <br />420 <br />421 Mr. Johnson noted the proposed additional educational efforts identifying those <br />422 available options. <br />423 <br />424 Member Cihacek agreed with a general outreach as well as more concentrated <br />425 efforts for higher risk properties and subsequent water quality impacts. Member <br />426 Cihacek suggested including educational pieces allowing the public to see the larger <br />427 or broader benefits in their efforts to addr# those higher risk areas. <br />428 <br />429 Mr. Johnson duly noted that request as well. <br />430 <br />431 Chair Stenlund suggested thatuor next year's annual report, staff didn't need to <br />432 provide a copy of the permit itself, only a link to it on the City's website. However, <br />433 Chair Stenlund asked that staff provide specific information on each MCM <br />434 (example: BMP No. 2 related to spring clean-up efforts) comparing from one year <br />435 to the next to identify those areas on which progress was being made and those <br />436 failing or losing "'bound. Chair Stenlund opined that this would provide a trending <br />437 point of view with several years of data available during the actual permit period. <br />438 <br />439 Mr. Johnson duly noted that request. <br />440 <br />441 Member Seigler requested a graft showing trending for phosphorus as well; and <br />442 Chair Stenlund requested trending in reducing TMDL's. <br />443 <br />444 Chair Stenlund thanked Mr. Johnson for his informative annual report. <br />Page 10 of 18 <br />