Laserfiche WebLink
630 Member Lenz opined that this process and guide needed to remain municipally <br />631 driven, using recent issues with St. Paul District Council 7 and trash haulers. <br />632 <br />633 Member Cihacek suggested engaging Ramsey County from an educational <br />634 standpoint, suggesting they provide information to Mr. Culver to consolidate <br />635 information for the guide and provide a recommendation for staff to work with <br />636 those available resources. <br />637 <br />638 Member Seigler suggesting posting this draft document as is and if interest was <br />639 generated, efforts could then be taken to improve it; otherwise, no further efforts <br />640 were needed. <br />641 <br />642 Since the suggested revisions were not major, Cihacek noted the difficult <br />gg J � Y <br />643 in changing a document once posted versus before. Member Cihacek opined that <br />644 whatever was posted needed to be the final tool or staff t e would only be <br />645 increased accordingly. <br />646 % dk� <br />647 Member Seigler sought clarification from staff as to whether they wanted changes <br />648 now or for individual members to provide them to staff for presentation to the City <br />649 Council for the joint meeting. °11ii�lllllllllllll�. <br />650 <br />651 Mr. Culver clarified that it was staff s intent to bring forward a consensus of the <br />652 PWETC with minor modifications as indicated as part of tonight's discussion; and <br />653 then present the revised draft document at the June 22 joint meeting. If the <br />654 consensus of the PWETC was for Member Wozniak and Ramsey County staff to <br />655 offer some suggestions, Mr. Culver offered to redraft the document, and simply <br />656 legaliz.that he could provide as a revised document to the PWETC for their <br />657 feedback prior to presentation he City Council. However, if the PWETC found <br />658 major issues, Mr. Culver uggested presentation to the City Council be delayed to <br />659 allow further review and ideration before making a recommendation. <br />660 <br />661 Member Wozniak encourage 1 PWETC members to provide suggestions and <br />662 clarified that it was not his intent to come at this from the perspective as an <br />663 employee of Ramsey County; but only offered to consult with his colleague on <br />664 preferable Commu ' ion styles. <br />665 11 <br />666 Mr. Culver exp ssed staff s appreciation of any revised language; offering to <br />667 incorporate them into a modified document; redistributing that to the PWETC <br />668 before the June 22, 2015 joint meeting. In order to meet pre -packet deadlines for <br />669 distribution, Mr. Culver advised that he would need that information by June 9, <br />670 2015 for final PWEC comments. <br />671 <br />672 Consensus of the PWETC was for staff to proceed as noted. <br />673 <br />674 7. Discussion Topics for June 22, 2015 Joint Meeting with City Council <br />Page 15 of 18 <br />