2015-06-23_PWETC_AgendaPacket - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Attachment E EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE VARIANCE BOARD OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE 1 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a public hearing was held at the regular meeting of the 2 Variance Board of the City of Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota, on the 3`d day of 3 December 2014, at 5:30 p.m. 4 The following members were present: 5 and was absent. 6 Variance Board Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 7 VB RESOLUTION NO. 110 s A RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE TO §1004.08 (IMPROVEMENT AREA) 9 OF THE CITY CODE TO ALLOW THE PROPOSED EXCESS PAVED SURFACES 10 AND BUILDING FOOTPRINTS AT 365 S OWASSO BOULEVARD (PF14-030) 11 WHEREAS, the subject property is legally described as: 12 PIN: 01-29-23-12-0072 13 All of Lot 7 of Lake Owasso Villa and Lot 8 of Lake Owasso Villa save and except that 14 portion of said Lot 8 described as follows: Beginning at the Northwesterly corner of Lot 8 15 Lake Owosso Villa, thence Northeasterly along the Northerly line of said Lot 8 for a 16 distance of 40 feet; thence Southerly to a point on the Southerly line of said Lot 8, 30 feet 17 Easterly of the Southwesterly corner of said Lot 8; thence Westerly along the Southerly line 18 of said Lot 8, 30 feet to the Southwesterly corner thereof; thence Northerly along the 19 Westerly line of sold Lot 8 to the Northwesterly corner of said Lot 8, being the point of 20 beginning, Ramsey County, Minnesota. 21 WHEREAS, City Code §1004.08 limits paved surfaces and building footprints to 25% of 22 the parcel area of the subject property; and 23 WHEREAS, Zawadski Homes, Inc., owner of the subject property, has requested a 24 variances to City Code §1004.08 to allow proposed paved surfaces and building footprints 25 covering 29.9% of the property; and 26 WHEREAS, City Code §1009.04 (Variances) establishes that the purpose of a variance is 27 "to permit adjustment to the zoning regulations where there are practical difficulties applying to a 23 parcel of land or building that prevent the property from being used to the extent intended by the 29 zoning;" and 30 WHEREAS, the Variance Board has made the following findings: 31 a. The practical difficulty stems from the fact that the proposed improvements would 32 likely be permitted by amended zoning provisions currently being prepared by 33 Roseville's Engineering Division staff, but the amendment may take a considerable Page 1 of 3