Laserfiche WebLink
Attachment E <br />34 amount of time to complete given the level of detail required, its potentially large <br />35 scope, and the fact that the amendment is not the Engineering Division's highest <br />36 priority project; <br />37 b. The proposal is generally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan in that the <br />33 residential improvements conform to the size and scale of what is promoted by the <br />39 Comprehensive Plan's goals and policies for residential areas; <br />40 c. The proposal is consistent with the intent of the zoning ordinances because while the <br />41 new improvements will involve more "building footprints and paved surfaces" than <br />42 the code text strictly allows, the zoning ordinance's intent is to regulate impervious <br />43 coverage and the proposed impervious coverage is within the regulatory limit; <br />44 d. The proposal makes reasonable use of the subject property because the improvements <br />45 would appear and function like a typical residential property while the proper <br />46 installation and maintenance of a pervious paving system will mitigate excess storm <br />47 water impacts; <br />43 e. The property possesses the kind of unique characteristics that justify approval of the <br />49 requested variance in the substandard parcel has area, which has the effect of the <br />50 proposed improvements occupying a larger percentage of the property than if the <br />51 improvements were situated on a parcel of conforming area. Moreover, the proposal <br />52 is consistent with code requirements likely to be adopted in the near future, although <br />53 the exact timing of such a zoning amendment is uncertain, and <br />54 f. Although the proposed residence is larger than the historically small homes in the <br />55 area, many of those older homes were originally built as cabins and the scale of the <br />56 proposed development is consistent with that of the newer homes that are being built <br />57 to replace the older structures, so approval of the variance would not negatively alter <br />53 the character of the surrounding residential neighborhood. <br />59 NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Roseville Variance Board, to approve a <br />60 variance to § 1004.08 of the City Code to allow the proposed excess paved surfaces and building <br />61 footprints at 365 S Owasso Boulevard, subject to the following conditions: <br />62 a. The driveway shall utilize materials and installation methods that are determined by <br />63 the City Engineer to achieve at least 50% perviousness as proposed and reviewed with <br />64 the variance application; and <br />65 b. Impervious surface area shall be limited to 25% of the parcel area, and the applicant <br />66 shall continue to work with Engineering Division staff to complete the Residential <br />67 Storm Water Permit process or otherwise comply with comparable City regulations in <br />63 place at the time of construction to install and maintain the pervious pavement. <br />69 The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Variance <br />70 Board Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor: , <br />71 and voted against; <br />72 WHEREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />