CC_Minutes_2015_0615 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

• Regular City Council Meeting Monday, June 15, 2015 Page 26 fort with projected levy increases or fee increases, Mayor Roe noted the move- ment toward using reserves for one-time expenses to address particular issues and with the understanding that they won't be repaid. Mayor Roe advised that he didn't anticipate use of reserves as part of the City Manager's recommended budget at the beginning of the process, while it may come up later. If the intent was not to pay back reserves, Councilmember McGehee asked that the City Council make themselves clear; and since a giant piece of the picture was the CIP that had a huge levy impact based on the commitment made, she consid- ered it to be an important part of the discussion process at the front end versus lat- er in the process. Mayor Roe agreed that made sense; and as the process was standardized, staff would address that from their perspective, and address unknown staff needs early on. Finance Director cautioned the City Council that the Finance Commission was still reviewing the CIP, at the City Council's directive; and while having prelimi- nary data, it was still in process and he was unsure if ramping up that timetable would allow sufficient time for them to complete their work. Mr. Miller noted that there were still large components to work through, and if the City Council wanted that complete review, it probably and realistically would not be available before August. Mayor Roe recognized that timetable, and suggested the work could begin earlier in the process for subsequent budgets. Finance Director Miller noted part of the issue was the timetable or staff to pro- vide information to the Finance Commission as the year progressed. While the 20-year CIP was adopted through 2034, Mr. Miller noted the handicap of not knowing the 2016 CIP, including the addition of park & recreation needs and fa- cilities that needed to be part of the recommendations, with a projected increase to the levy for just those purposes of$210,000. Preliminary Tax Levy Amount: Decrease,No Change, or Increase Councilmember Laliberte expressed her personal preference for no levy increase, which had been her consistent theme. While recognizing the need to get the CIP funding adequately on track, Councilmember Laliberte opined it would be her preference to factor that in early enough to accommodate that dollar amount ver- sus adding it on to the end numbers. Councilmember Etten expressed his interest in shooting for near inflation, with the exception of the capital pieces needed for investment to make up for past de- ferrals. Councilmember Etten expressed his preference for ongoing budgets to be held at a reasonable level long-term and tackling challenges in an honest, straight- .