My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2015_0615
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2015
>
CC_Minutes_2015_0615
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/25/2015 4:08:23 PM
Creation date
6/25/2015 3:59:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
6/15/2015
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,June 15, 2015 <br /> Page 25 <br /> serves for new staff positions proved problematic long-term. Councilmember Et- <br /> ten further opined that the status of reserve targets was fine now, but if their use <br /> continued annually, it would put the City in a hard position to work out of. <br /> Councilmember McGehee agreed with Councilmember Etten, opining that she <br /> had never been a proponent of using reserves, since the City Council had a history <br /> of not paying them back. Councilmember McGehee further opined that she did <br /> not support using reserves for operational costs; and expressed her comfort level <br /> with the cash reserve level for 2015, but did not want to dip much below the 40% <br /> target, with 35% the absolute bottom she would consider, based on the recom- <br /> mendations of the State Auditor. <br /> In general, Councilmember Laliberte spoke in support of using reserves as had <br /> been done in recent years, since they were taxpayer monies collected for specific <br /> purpose, and she could see no reason to hoard those funds. However, as stated by <br /> Councilmember Etten, Councilmember Laliberte agreed that she was not a fan of <br /> using them to fund something beyond a one-time expense or single year purposes. <br /> Since new positions were ongoing expenses, Councilmember Laliberte stated her <br /> lack of support in using reserves for that purpose. As far as repaying reserves, <br /> Councilmember Laliberte stated she did not necessarily feel the need to do so, <br /> since they were there to be used. <br /> Councilmember Willmus agreed with the comments of Councilmember Laliberte, <br /> opining that he found the City's reserve funds to be healthy and well within their <br /> target range. Regarding State Auditor guidelines, Councilmember Willmus noted <br /> their recommendation was to retain 5-6 months operating reserves in the General <br /> Fund, and noted that many communities fund everything through their General <br /> Fund, while the City has 25 plus funds. When looking at it under those circum- <br /> stances and in totality, Councilmember Willmus opined that the City's reserves <br /> were quite healthy. <br /> Addressing the disclaimer of Finance Director Miller (RCA, page 4), that as the <br /> budget increases the reserve target numbers will trend down, Councilmember <br /> Willmus opined that while this was the case between 2013 and 2014, it was diffi- <br /> cult for the City Council to make an informed decision at this point in the process <br /> (e.g. COLA, reserves, and new positions) when the full picture had yet to be de- <br /> termined. Of greater importance to him, Councilmember Willmus sought more <br /> information on the carry forward from last year, and how to plug that into the up- <br /> coming budget and how that necessary information entered into the conversation <br /> going forward. <br /> Speaking in general, Mayor Roe stated his preference to use reserves if needed, <br /> while also looking to other funding sourcesfirst including property taxes and fees <br /> before using reserves. Moving to the end of the process and increasing discom- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.