CC_Minutes_2015_0615 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday,June 15, 2015 Page 28 ments perform similar analyses and reconfigure how more entry level positions could be made available to allow managers more flexibility in addressing their work loads. City Manager Trudgeon responded that this was typically addressed by interns; and in the Public Works Department had resulted from hiring a front desk posi- tion at a lower grade than in the past. Mr. Trudgeon noted that consideration also was needed to recognize that total costs also involved benefits, not just wages. City Manager Trudgeon advised that, while some areas may not be as apparent, he and management staff would look into other areas as well. From his limited examples, Councilmember Etten opined that maintaining 100% of single coverage was a pretty common practice; and when desiring to hire quali- ty staff, it was still less expensive to offer single coverage versus family coverage; and expressed his concern in dropping that as an option. While hoping the pro- jected employee healthcare increase of 10% could be successfully negotiated lower than that, Councilmember Etten offered his support of a COLA increase for employees. Councilmember McGehee agreed with Councilmember Etten, opining it was im- portant to offer that single benefit at the entry level. Councilmember McGehee stated her preference for maintaining healthcare benefits as currently done unless overwhelming evidence was provided that the system was way out of sync. Councilmember McGehee offered her support of an employee COL in line with that negotiated by unions on a consistent basis. At the request of Mayor Roe, City Manager Trudgeon advised that all bargaining unit contracts, with the exception of the firefighter contract (which does not yet exist), were up in 2016; with several bargaining units settled at 2%. Mr. Trudg- eon advised that he anticipated addressing this issue at a Closed Session on July 6, 2015 for City Council review and direction. Based on his observations and considering peer cities, CPI and other factors, Mayor Roe noted he was not seeing 3.5% Cola; and based on his experience in the private sector, and his participation in single coverage, he was not aware that they paid 100%. Mayor Roe opined that this indicated that there must be other models out there, and his preference to review those models to make sure the cur- rent City of Roseville benefit structure still made sense. With concurrence of his colleagues, Councilmember Etten clarified that single coverage was not free, since those employees also had to pay deductibles, co- pays, etc.