Laserfiche WebLink
d. <br />Adequate queuing lane space shall be provided without interfering with on-site <br />96 <br />parking/circulation. Based on the proposed plan there is queuing for 15+ vehicles given the <br />97 <br />current 4-lane configuration; the Planning Division has deemed that queuing to be more than <br />98 <br />adequate for this use. Circulation for the site is well-designed, and patrons utilizing the <br />99 <br />drive-through will have a designated exit. <br />100 <br />e. <br />Speaker box sounds from the drive-through lane shall not be loud enough to constitute a <br />101 <br />nuisance on an abutting residentially zoned property or property in residential use. The <br />102 <br />proposed drive-through and its teller islands will lie directly adjacent a parking lot and <br />103 <br />should not be a nuisance to any residential use in the area (single family homes along Gluek <br />104 <br />Lane can be found on the other side (south) of Highway 36 approximately 650 feet from the <br />105 <br />proposed Spire drive-through). <br />106 <br />f. <br />Drive-through canopies and other structures, where present, shall be constructed from the <br />107 <br />same materials as the primary building and with a similar level of architectural quality and <br />108 <br />detailing. The final design of the building and drive-through will include building and <br />109 <br />roofing materials that are consistent and/or similar or complementary to one another, and will <br />110 <br />have been approved by the Planning Division. <br />111 <br />g. <br />A 10-foot buffer area with screen planting and an opaque wall or fence between 6 and 8 feet <br />112 <br />in height shall be required between the drive-through lane and any property line adjoining a <br />113 <br />residentially zoned property or property in residential use. This requirement is not <br />114 <br />applicable to the CU request because an office use and Community Business zoned property <br />115 <br />lies directly adjacent to the north of the proposed drive-through facility. <br />116 <br />Roseville’s Development Review Committee, a body comprised of staff from various City <br />117 <br />departments, met on May 7, 2015, to discuss the application. There were no concerns pertaining <br />118 <br />to the CU provided by members. <br />119 <br />A review of the proposed drive-through based on the current standards and <br />120 CONDITIONAL USE <br />criteria leads the City Planner to conclude that the use can meet all of the applicable <br />121 <br />requirements. <br />122 <br />Section 1009.02.E of the City Code requires the applicant to validate an approval of the <br />123 <br /> by the time construction of the proposed improvements related to the drive- <br />124 CONDITIONAL USE <br />through begins. If the approval has not been validated within one year, the approval will expire <br />125 <br />and become void. <br />126 <br />PC <br />UBLICOMMENT <br />127 <br />As of the date of printing of this report, the Planning Division has not received any calls or <br />128 <br />emails regarding the Conditional Use for the drive-through associated with the proposed new <br />129 <br />development. <br />130 <br />PSR <br />LANNINGTAFF ECOMMENDATION <br />131 <br />Based on the comments and findings outlined in the above sections of this report, the Planning <br />132 <br />Division recommends approval of the proposed pursuant to §1005.03 and <br />133 CONDITIONAL USE <br />§1009.02 of the Roseville City Code. <br />134 <br />135 <br />PF15-007_RPCA_060315 <br />Page 4 of 5 <br /> <br />