My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2015_0622
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2015
>
CC_Minutes_2015_0622
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2015 1:28:00 PM
Creation date
7/10/2015 4:05:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
6/22/2015
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
152
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,June 22, 2015 <br /> Page 14 <br /> 12. Public Hearings <br /> 13. Budget Items <br /> 14. Business Items (Action Items) <br /> a. Consider Policy Priority Planning Document <br /> As Councilmember Laliberte had been unable to attend the initial discussion of <br /> Councilmembers in May when this document was discussed, Mayor Roe invited <br /> her to share her feedback at this time. <br /> At the request of Councilmember Laliberte, the "City of Roseville-Strategic Plan <br /> Summary for 2015-17 (part of Attachment C, page 3) was displayed for reference <br /> during her comments. In general, and as she previously shared with her col- <br /> leagues and City Manager Trudgeon, Councilmember Laliberte stated she was not <br /> in favor of adopting the strategic initiatives as presented. Councilmember <br /> Laliberte reviewed each of the five strategic priorities listed and provided her <br /> comments specific to each. <br /> Civic Engagement <br /> Councilmember Laliberte questioned how or whether to include this as part of the <br /> strategic plan, especially her differing view of proposed strategic initiatives laid <br /> out by staff. Recognizing that increased engagement was an overarching priority <br /> of this City Council, and recent creation of the new Community Engagement <br /> Commission (CEC), and regular requests of and a desire by staff and the commu- <br /> nity to improve those engagement efforts, Councilmember Laliberte questioned <br /> the need to included it as part of the strategic plan when it was already a given. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte opined that the use of "civic" and "community" en- <br /> gagement meant different things, and while the City Council values that area of <br /> focus, she found a gap in understanding how best to achieve it. Until that became <br /> a common understanding among all stakeholders, Councilmember Laliberte sug- <br /> gested it not be included as a new goal; and not be a checklist, but an ongoing <br /> process and culture shift that the City Council and staff had already made a com- <br /> mitment to. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte expressed her confidence in allowing the newly-formed <br /> CEC, and her expectations of staff to engage the community, would suffice with- <br /> out defining additional strategic initiatives. In consideration of those initiatives <br /> proposed by staff, Councilmember Laliberte noted the Key Outcome Indicator <br /> (KOI) for community satisfaction was already being addressed in surveys with <br /> commitment by the City Council to perform them every other year. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.