My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2015_0622
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2015
>
CC_Minutes_2015_0622
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2015 1:28:00 PM
Creation date
7/10/2015 4:05:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
6/22/2015
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
152
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,June 22,2015 <br /> Page 15 <br /> Regarding the KOI to increase volunteer opportunities, Councilmember Laliberte <br /> opined that the target goal to simply increase volunteer opportunities by 5%didn't <br /> necessarily translate into engagement. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte opined that the KOI of improving participation by un- <br /> der-represented populations in Roseville and target of engaging three new seg- <br /> ments of the community, while appreciated, also did not mean engagement. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte questioned if any of the targets or strategic initiatives as <br /> proposed actually got at what was needed or what the City Council hoped to ac- <br /> complish. <br /> Housing and Redevelopment <br /> Councilmember Laliberte opined that this section needed more work by the City <br /> Council as a group, since it involved bigger issues and involved multiple depart- <br /> ments, commissions, community stakeholders and others. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte opined that the KOI of SE Roseville should be a priori- <br /> ty for everyone, but suggested more progress could be made if that priority re- <br /> mained open, and the who, what and when was better defined. <br /> Regarding Twin Lakes, Councilmember Laliberte opined that there remained <br /> more work to do, and a clear priority should be for the City to define that work, <br /> the steps and processes to achieve it, and goals at the end of the process. <br /> Regarding move-up-housing, Councilmember Laliberte agreed that it could be an <br /> initiative, but since the City didn't own the land, further discussion was needed <br /> about what was possible, what the City Council needed from staff and advisory <br /> commissions, and then set targets that could be realistically achieved. <br /> Regarding the value of residential housing, Councilmember Laliberte suggested <br /> more discussion about the specifics of that section and proposed targets as cur- <br /> rently outlined. <br /> Effective Governance <br /> Councilmember Laliberte suggested striking this strategic priority completely, <br /> opining that it involved individual leadership and actions speaking louder than <br /> words from each person. Councilmember Laliberte opined that the proposed tar- <br /> gets and strategic initiatives didn't serve to resolve any particular item; and rec- <br /> ognized that involving the community may mean issues take longer to bring to <br /> fruition. As far as the process transparency KOI, Councilmember Laliberte <br /> agreed with the concept, but since staff and the CEC had already been tasked to <br /> pursue that continuum, no new document was needed. <br /> Specific to the KOI of respectful interaction of the leadership team, Councilmem- <br /> ber Laliberte further opined that this was up to each individual and that there was <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.