My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2015_0622
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2015
>
CC_Minutes_2015_0622
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2015 1:28:00 PM
Creation date
7/10/2015 4:05:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
6/22/2015
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
152
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,June 22, 2015 <br /> Page 18 <br /> Councilmember Laliberte opined that the SWOT analysis provided good infor- <br /> mation, much of which didn't rise to the final document,but worth reviewing, and <br /> recommended that should be done on an annual basis moving forward. Coun- <br /> cilmember Laliberte suggested a swift review of the SWOT document be per- <br /> formed each January as part of the organizational meeting. <br /> Councilmember Comments/Feedback <br /> Councilmember McGehee <br /> In response to Councilmember Laliberte, Councilmember McGehee agreed with <br /> her comments regarding civic engagement and effective governance, and empha- <br /> sized her concurrence that both are cultural and under individual control. In terms <br /> of transparency, Councilmember McGehee suggested the development of policies <br /> addressing a known and clear process inviting specific elements of a neighbor- <br /> hood or other or civic participation opportunity. If those policies are not built into <br /> programming, Councilmember McGehee opined it would continue to be incon- <br /> sistent on only complaint-driven. <br /> Regarding move-up housing, Councilmember McGehee opined a good discussion <br /> had been held at the Retreat about that, and when she considers the twenty new <br /> units and their price point as part of the revised Dale Street Project, she thought <br /> that could be removed from the list once they're constructed. <br /> Councilmember McGehee agreed that she didn't like the checklist approach ei- <br /> ther, and while agreeing this had been a good exercise, some things had come out <br /> of the Retreat that did not become part of the final report, nor had they been dis- <br /> cussed in any meaningful way even though she found the overall discussion to be <br /> good. <br /> Councilmember McGehee agreed with the need to shine a light on the asset man- <br /> agement program for continue monitoring and subsequent completion. <br /> In terms of civic engagement, Councilmember McGehee opined that the City <br /> Council and City still had a long way to go, but the checklist would not get any- <br /> one there, and required a cultural shift. Agreeing that outreach was a fine initia- <br /> tive, Councilmember McGehee opined that it needed to be to everyone, not only <br /> targeting a specific group, but across the board. <br /> Whether or not an employee survey is done, Councilmember McGehee opined <br /> that it was important for the City Council to understand staff jobs. Councilmem- <br /> ber Member McGehee suggested that may be accomplished through the City <br /> Manager proposing a policy for consistent exit interviews; and how to provide <br /> enough steps within each department to satisfy employees as they grow in their <br /> career. Councilmember McGehee stated she would defer to the City Manager on <br /> this topic, and if he felt a survey was needed he could provide information going <br /> forward to establish a policy. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.