My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2015_0622
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2015
>
CC_Minutes_2015_0622
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2015 1:28:00 PM
Creation date
7/10/2015 4:05:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
6/22/2015
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
152
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,June 22, 2015 <br /> Page 25 <br /> To clarify the amendment, Mayor Roe reworded it as intended to add a third pri- <br /> ority entitled, "Community Outreach/Communication," incorporating the process <br /> transparency KOI category from "Effective Governance," and participation by <br /> underrepresented populations KOI category as part of"Civic Engagement" at a <br /> minimum. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte expressed her interest in working more closely with cit- <br /> izen advisory commissions on guiding principles to use in working on priorities, <br /> not as a checklist but guiding those things not being tasked to advisory commis- <br /> sions. <br /> Councilmember McGehee spoke in opposition to the amendment, agreeing with <br /> Councilmember Laliberte that the original motion presented a more manageable <br /> and cleaner approach, while still allowing inclusion of those other items as ad- <br /> dressed by Councilmember Laliberte. Councilmember McGehee expressed her <br /> preference for a clean, comprehensive document. <br /> Councilmember Etten stated his rationale for including the amendment was based <br /> on the reasons outlined by Councilmember McGehee; opining that it included in <br /> the document it allowed for regular updates and tracking versus a checklist. <br /> Councilmember Willmus stated his concern was even in providing charges to citi- <br /> zen advisory commissions, as a body the CEC incorporated a good group of peo- <br /> ple that he would like to allow an opportunity to take this document and see what <br /> they returned with versus the City Council now establishing its own KOI and tar- <br /> gets. Councilmember Willmus suggested allowing the CEC to bring it back; and <br /> therefore would not support the friendly amendment at this time; concurring with <br /> the two items in the original motion as moved by Councilmembers Laliberte and <br /> McGehee, and including the four goals stated by Councilmember McGehee and <br /> embedded in each goal. <br /> • <br /> Mayor Roe spoke in support of the amendment, stating that the priority of this <br /> City Council is to improve communications through the process of transparency, <br /> and nothing talked about the targets in the original, thus the added third category <br /> included. As noted by Councilmember Etten, if additional KOI are received from <br /> the CEC or others, they can be added in, but this amendment to the motion re- <br /> flected the February Retreat and subsequent discussions, and needed to be amend- <br /> ed to the original motion to adequately address the priorities of this City Council <br /> and the City organization. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte stated she would not support the amendment for the <br /> main reason that this direction had already been given and requests that these <br /> things happen outside of this document. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.