My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2015_0622
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2015
>
CC_Minutes_2015_0622
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2015 1:28:00 PM
Creation date
7/10/2015 4:05:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
6/22/2015
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
152
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,June 22, 2015 <br /> Page 26 <br /> Roll Call (Amendment) <br /> Ayes: Etten and Roe. <br /> Nays: Willmus, McGehee, Laliberte. <br /> Motion fails. <br /> Roll Call (Original Motion) <br /> Ayes: McGehee, Willmus, Laliberte, Etten, and Roe. <br /> Nays: None. <br /> As a follow-up to staff, without objection Mayor Roe directed that the "Rapp" <br /> document be identified as reference material only, and not the official document <br /> until this new revision was created as a separate document. <br /> For clarification, City Manager Trudgeon reviewed that staff would create a simi- <br /> lar one-page document listing the two priorities as adopted and KOI as part of that <br /> revised and separate document; with the "Rapp" report serving as reference mate- <br /> rial, and including the SWOT analysis. <br /> At the request of City Manager Trudgeon as to whether to include Councilmem- <br /> ber McGehee's four goals, Mayor Roe clarified that they were not yet an official <br /> action of the City Council at this time. <br /> Regarding targets and strategic initiatives to support what has now been adopted <br /> by the City Council, Councilmember Laliberte asked that at a future work session, <br /> they discuss those further, at which time citizen advisory commission, staff and <br /> other feedback could be engaged providing a much broader group than just the <br /> City Council. <br /> Personally, Mayor Roe opined the City Council needed to decide how to move on <br /> from here as a body. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte opined those groups be involved a City Council work <br /> session. <br /> Mayor Roe asked if this only got us back to the same current issue if citizen advi- <br /> sory commissions were part of that discussion, questioning if the City Council <br /> needed to figure it out now or have it as part of the next step in the conversation. <br /> Next Steps <br /> Councilmember McGehee yielded to Councilmember Laliberte on the work ses- <br /> sion, taking those two main items and KOI, with each individual coming up with <br /> a list of what they would like to see for the direction from input received from cit- <br /> izen advisory commissions and sending that input to the City Manager for dissem- <br /> ination, with the subsequent meeting to determine consensus. After that, Coun- <br /> cilmember McGehee suggested that document be forwarded to commissions for <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.