CC_Minutes_2015_0622 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday,June 22, 2015 Page 6 Nays: None. 10. General Ordinances for Adoption a. Community Development Department Request for an ordinance Amendment Adjusting the 2015 Electrical Inspection Service Contract Fee Schedule Codes Coordinator Don Munson briefly reviewed the request as detailed in the RCA dated June 22, 2015; noting that Electrical Inspector Peter Tokle was also present tonight for any questions of the City Council or public. Mayor Roe noted on the draft revised 2015 fee schedule dated July 1, 2015 (At- tachment C), the language/fees listed on the tables had not been stricken while the text around the tables had been revised and questioned if this needed further revi- sion. Mr. Munson apologized for this typographical error, and confirmed that it would need further revision and included in the description, with new headings above the charts. Since the revised fee schedule goes into effect July 1, 2015, Mayor Roe suggest- ed, without objection, tabling action at this time, and have staff get a corrected version for action later in tonight's meeting. Recess Mayor Roe recessed the meeting at approximately 6:29 p.m., and reconvened at approximately 6:32 p.m. 4. Public Comment Mayor Roe recognized a resident just now arriving and having sought to address the City Council during the public comment portion of the meeting. Back to Public Comment Mary Bridgeman,471 Wagner Ms. Bridgeman wished to address her personal concerns with Roseville residents feeding wildlife, noting a $500 bill she had incurred to address raccoon/wildlife control for rac- coons found living under her porch. Ms. Bridgeman advised that, upon further investiga- tion, it had been found that someone in the neighborhood had been feeding the raccoons. Ms. Bridgeman stated that she had contacted Parks & Recreation Director Lonnie Brokke regarding what the City was doing about feeding wildlife in Roseville, and her under- standing that there was currently no code to address that issue. Ms. Bridgeman sought in- formation on the status of such a code. Ms. Bridgeman noted that the cost for the inspec- tion of$214 and $59 for each raccoon removed from the service she'd used was an ex- panse she could not afford. Ms. Bridgeman stated that she felt helpless in being able to address this concern.