Laserfiche WebLink
18 ownership approval documentation will be required at submittal of documents necessary for City <br />� 9 signatures and prior to plat recording. <br />20 RECOMMENDATION <br />2� The amended CIC plat meets or exceeds a11 applicable requirements, however, after the Planning <br />22 Commission hearing on this matter, the City Planner determined the following condition should <br />23 be included in the approval. <br />24 l. The applicant/property owner is �esponsible for providing w�itten evidence of �approval to <br />25 �nodify Unit 6 from the Condo Association, thus allowing a small po�tion of common area to <br />26 be added into the building a�ea. <br />2� Since the Council's approval, the City Planner has worlced with the applicant on completing all <br />28 final documents however, compiling all necessary signatures of approval from the ownership <br />2g group is still being completed. With that said, the City Planner would offer a slightly modified <br />so tp the previous conditional of approval to allow the project to move forward: <br />3� 1. The applicant/property owner is responsible for providing written evidence, in a orrn <br />32 acceptable to the Citv Atto�ne�, of approval to modify Unit 6 f�om the Condo Association, <br />33 thus allowing a small portion of common area to be added into the building area. The <br />34 written evidence o ownership a�proval shall be submitted at the time final documents are <br />s5 submittedefo� Citv si�natures and cannot be released for recordin� until received. <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />Based on the comments and findings outlined above, the Planning Division recommends <br />approval of the proposed A1�tE1vDED CIC PLAT pursuant to Title 11 of the Roseville City Code. <br />PARK DEDICATION <br />On June 2, 2015, the Roseville Park and Recreation Commission considered whether the <br />4o proposed amended CIC plat required park dedication and determined that a fee in lieu of land <br />4� dedication in the amount of $50,106 (7% of fair market value of Unit 6) should be assessed to <br />42 the project. However, after review of State Statutes and the Roseville City C regarding park <br />43 dedication requirements, the City Attorney does not feel we the City can charge park dedication <br />44 <br />45 <br />as part of this approval. <br />RECOMMENDED ACTION <br />46 Adopt a resolution approving the proposed change to Unit 6 of Rosedale Corporate Plaza <br />4� Condominium AtvtElvnEn CIC PLAT based on the comments and finding that the proposed final <br />48 amended CIC plat is consistent with the preliminary amended CIC plat and reflects the <br />49 applicable condition of the preliminary approval. <br />50 <br />51 <br />52 <br />53 <br />54 <br />ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS <br />Pass a motion to table the item for future action. Per Minnesota State Statutes §462.358, the <br />City Council has until September 12, 2015, (60 days) to approve/deny the request before an <br />extension is necessary. <br />PF15-005 RCA FinalPlat 072015.doc <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />