2015_0723_CCpacket - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

"'"e. � � <;�„�;�"� �`� s�. ��'i � �� As to the number of units, Mr. Messner con�rmed that it would not change, and displayed a better drawing depicting the plans and location of the proposed addition. Mr. Messner noted the existing canopy that would be redone but remain in place. Specific to parking, Mr disturb any stalls, and addition of a small pool. Messner advised that there were no plans to reduce or everything would remain branded as is, with only the At the request of Chair Boguszewski, Mr. Messner confirmed that the pool would be an indoor, enclosed pool. Specific to ownership sign-off, Mr. Messner clarified that the property belonged to an association and they would need to approve the proposal, which was still pending at this time with only a preliminary plan recently submitted to them. Mr. Messner reported that the results of their decision would carry weight as to whether or not this proposal proceeded. Member Murphy questioned if what was currently outlined on the map was currently part of the common area for the community rather than part of the description of the current Unit 6. Member Murphy clarified that the reason for the applicant's request, represented by Mr. Messner, was to present the application and take the lead for the proposed change on behalf of the association. Mr. Messner responded affirmatively. Mr. Messner responded affirmatively, advising that the only change in the original description would be an increase in the square footage. Chair Boguszewski closed the public hearing at approximately �:28 p.m.; with no one appearing for or against Member Murphy stated that his only comment would be that this application represents only one owner of a shared community, who was proposing something. Under those circumstances and as a Planning Commissioner, Member Murphy noted that he found the application something he could support, while recognizing the need for the majority in the CIC to concur. Chair Boguszewski recognized Member Murphy's comments. MOTION Member Cunningham moved, seconded by Member Gitzen to recommend to the City Council approval of the proposed changes to Unit 6 of Rosedale Corporate Plaza Condominium PRELIMINARY PLAT, based on the comments and findings of the staff report dated May 6, 20�5. Ayes: � Nays: o Abstentions: Motion carried.