res_11233 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

any costs and/or engineering services related to said mitigation and changes to the in-place agreement between Roseville and Rice Creek Watershed District will be the sole responsibility of the applicant; 3. The developer/applicant shall continue working with the Roseville Public Works Department to address easements (including trail) and water and sewer infrastructure requirements as necessary. These plans must be approved by the City Engineer prior to submittal of the FINAL PLAT for City signatures; 4. The developer shall dedicate and maintain access easements across its lot in a form acceptable to the City Attorney to ensure permanent access to Mount Ridge Road and from Twin Lakes Parkway for the adjacent parcel; and 5. The developer shall enter into shared parking agreements in a form acceptable to the City Attorney to ensure parking needs are met during extraordinary events. The shared parking agreement between the lots within this subdivision shall be permanent, since they are single ownership. However, the shared parking agreement with the property to the north will have an exit clause to protect each owner's rights in case of parking abuse by the adjacent property, since they are not under the same ownership. This property is proposed to be parked at the maximum number of surface parking spaces allowed by the Code. Any parking expansion would need to be contained in a parking structure per Code. 6. Pursuant to City Code§1103.07, the City Council will accept park dedication of cash in lieu of land in the amount of$123,298 or 7%of the Fair Market Value of the property. The park dedication shall be made by the applicant before the signed final plat is released for recording at Ramsey County. 7. Additional review related to specific utility design and connections as well as storm water requirements will be made at the time of a formal building permit application. The applicant is advised that their drainage report should specifically identify the impacts to the in place storm water devices for the right in (and the right out if ultimately approved) and also identify the specific mitigation for that disturbance. 8. While approval of the final plat does not memorialize access as shown in the submittal, it should be noted that staff has not approved the right-out access onto Twin Lakes Parkway. It is the determination of staff that without knowing more specific information about the actual users of the proposed buildings we don't have enough information to justify the added disturbance to the in place storm water devices along Twin Lakes Parkway. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member Willmus and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor: Willmus, Laliberte, Etten, McGehee, Roe and none voted against. WHEREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Page 2 of 3