CC_Minutes_2015_0713 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday,July 13, 2015 Page 23 gested reviewing and revamping how advisory commissions worked as a whole, rather than simply focusing on these two. While there may be positive reasons to combine the HRC and CEC, after hearing comments from commissioners, Coun- cilmember Etten suggesting leaving them separate for now to see how things grew; while recognizing that maybe some other combination would allow more vitality and excitement for those volunteer participants. While recognizing the merit in all of the options, Councilmember Laliberte ex- pressed concern in merging the HRC and CEC. Councilmember Laliberte opined that the CEC should not have more responsibilities added to their plate by ex- panding membership at this time, or by increasing their scope of duties or func- tions, which she found unfair to them as a newly-created commission. On the other side, Councilmember Laliberte agreed to be open to look at the role of the HRC, opining that the work they did, from her perspective, was not the work of an HRC whether from a complaint-based or other scenario. While it would be great to have that in place if a complaint occurs, of course, Councilmember Laliberte opined she was their role more in the celebration, education, awareness, and diversity and sensitivity training realm. Whether called an HRC or by anoth- er name not in line with the state human rights function, Councilmember Laliberte suggested it and the Ethics Commission needed meaningful work to avoid frustra- tion. Councilmember Laliberte suggested that clear direction be provided to any commission going forward, to make sure their charge was meaningful. While ap- preciating the role of the HRC in bringing the naturalization ceremony to Rose- ville, Councilmember Laliberte questioned if the HRC needed to continue that handholding, opining staff could potentially continue to sponsor or host it on an annual basis without the HRC owning that work. If there is still live in the annual essay contest, based on her observation and comments heard about its dysfunction in the past and Roseville being the only participate at the state level, Coun- cilmember Laliberte stated she could support that, as long as it was recognized that the City of Roseville's role was not to support state human rights efforts. Councilmember Laliberte stated she was open to renaming two individual com- missions, combining them, or changing their schedule pending on the specifics the City Council wanted each to accomplish. However, Councilmember Laliberte opined that the current "loosey-goosey" status could not continue to create frus- trations for those advisors. When creating the Finance and CEC Commissions, Councilmember Willmus not- ed discussions at that time included the possibility of the HRC becoming the CEC. At that time, Councilmember Willmus,stated he had fought for the HRC and CEC to remain separate, with the CEC a standalone commission. Coun- cilmember Willmus stated his further concern in overburdening the CEC as it cur- rently exists; and his comments to staff when first discussing this was to have eve- ryone in the room to weigh in. That said, Councilmember Willmus opined that the HRC, even when fully populated, experienced issues with materials, a lack of commitment from some commissioners making it difficult for remaining mem-