My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2015_0713
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2015
>
CC_Minutes_2015_0713
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2015 3:20:20 PM
Creation date
7/24/2015 3:50:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
7/13/2015
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,July 13,2015 <br /> Page 29 <br /> Section G: Councilmember Etten questioned if the expectation for subcommittees <br /> was to record their meetings to be articulated back to the larger commission. <br /> Councilmember Willmus opined it would be beneficial if there was informal <br /> meeting notes at a minimum, to which Councilmember Laliberte agreed. <br /> Mayor Roe noted that if the subcommittee reported to the full body their discus- <br /> sion, it would be recorded in the official commission meeting minutes. <br /> Councilmember Etten sought to ensure those noted were discussed with the full <br /> body and televised. <br /> City Manager Trudgeon suggested additional language to Section "201.06: Or- <br /> ganization, Item C:"to the effect that subcommittees and/or task forces will report <br /> back to the full body by extension in meeting minutes." <br /> Public Comment <br /> Gary Grefenberg, 91 Mid Oaks Lane <br /> Speaking on behalf of the CEC recommendations of 2014, Mr. Grefenberg noted <br /> that one missing item was requiring all commissions to provide for public com- <br /> ment. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte and Mayor Roe referenced Section 201.07.F. <br /> Mr. Grefenberg opined that it needed to be made clearer that it may not necessari- <br /> ly be related to generic public comment,but to a specific agenda issue. <br /> Mayor Roe clarified Mr. Grefenberg's intent for having it as a standing item on <br /> each agenda similar to that of the City Council. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte recognized the need for two different comment sec- <br /> tions, one calling verbally for comment at the beginning of a meeting, and then <br /> for each item;but expressed her difficulty in wording that intent. <br /> Mr. Grefenberg opined that "...at the meeting..." seemed ambiguous, but sug- <br /> gested language provided more clarification as long as it was assured that public <br /> comment on each agenda item would be heard prior to them taking action on it. <br /> Discussion ensued regarding when and how to provide for this intent, with sug- <br /> gestions of individual councilmember. At the conclusion, City Manager Trudg- <br /> eon suggested the following language, supported by the body without opposition: <br /> "A commission must allow public comment for each agenda item and for a gen- <br /> eral time for public comment at the beginning of each meeting." <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.