My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2015_0706
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2015
>
CC_Minutes_2015_0706
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2015 3:43:32 PM
Creation date
7/27/2015 9:28:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
7/6/2015
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,July 6, 2015 <br /> Page 4 <br /> Councilmember Laliberte questioned if the City should have such a policy in <br /> place based on a specific department and/or project. <br /> Mayor Roe suggested this was more of a question for the City Council than for <br /> City Manager Trudgeon. <br /> Specific to the Wagner Lift Station, Councilmember Laliberte questioned if the <br /> cost of developing plans and specifications had been budgeted for or if those costs <br /> were folded into the overall bid. <br /> City Manager Trudgeon responded it had not been part of the bid, but was an ad- <br /> ditional project cost; with the construction bid coming in higher than the actual <br /> engineer's estimate. <br /> Since it was a project already planned, Councilmember Laliberte asked if those <br /> costs were covered for that development work. <br /> City Manager Trudgeon responded generally, with every project, the design work <br /> was part of the overall cost and therefore factored into estimates. However, Mr. <br /> Trudgeon noted that the bid climate had recently gone up significantly. <br /> At the request of Mayor Roe, Public Works Director/Engineer Marc Culver apol- <br /> ogized for not breaking down those design costs in the Request for Council Ac- <br /> tion (RCA), as had been done in the upcoming I-35W Interchange project, show- <br /> ing the breakdown of consultant fees compared to overall project costs. Histori- <br /> cally as part of this Wagner Lift Station project, Mr. Culver advised that in <br /> March, the City Council approved the firm of Bolton & Menk, Inc. to develop <br /> plans and specifications to reconstruction the lift station, as well as their oversight <br /> of the work, with bids for the work itself subsequently received on June 17, 2015. <br /> On a related note, Mr. Culver advised that the firm of S.E.H. had been retained for <br /> the same consultant work and oversight for the St. Croix Stormwater Lift Station <br /> Project, coming before the City Council for bid award in the near future. Mr. <br /> Culver advised that he would make sure the budget breakdown was provided in <br /> that RCA. For both projects, Mr. Culver advised that funding would come from <br /> the respective enterprise funds as applicable; and as noted by City Manager <br /> Trudgeon, agreed with his comments about the current bidding climate. Howev- <br /> er, given the age of this lift station, even though the bids had come in higher than <br /> anticipated, Mr. Culver opined it was worth updating the facility. <br /> As indicated in the RCA, page 1, Mayor Roe noted the original estimated cost of <br /> $280,000 for the project, and actual construction and engineering proposals of <br /> over $294,702.61. Mayor Roe asked if the additional cost above the construction <br /> bid amount of$268,000 was representative of the engineering costs (approximate- <br /> ly$28,000). <br /> I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.