My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2015-06-30 HRA_Special_Meeting_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Housing Redevelopment Authority
>
Minutes
>
2015
>
2015-06-30 HRA_Special_Meeting_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/4/2015 8:39:58 AM
Creation date
8/4/2015 8:39:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Housing Redevelopment Authority
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
6/30/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
HRA Special Meeting <br />Minutes – Tuesday, June 30, 2015 <br />Page 11 <br />1 <br />Ms. Raye stated that she anticipated that as an actual goal for future discussions as subsets are <br />2 <br />established for each goal. <br />3 <br />4 <br />5.BREAK <br />5 <br />Chair Maschka recessed the meeting at approximately 6:38 p.m. and reconvened at <br />6 <br />approximately 6:50 p.m. <br />7 <br />8 <br />6.Possible Priorities and Projects for Next Plan <br />9 <br />Ms. Raye provided a brief recap of discussions held so far and as detailed on the flip charts; noting they <br />10 <br />already addressed areas from the previous work plan for 2013 housing priorities; reviewed City Council <br />11 <br />priorities; and those goals to carry forward from the last strategic plan. <br />12 <br />13 <br />Therefore, Ms. Raye suggested, prior to receiving public comment from those in attendance, the HRA <br />14 <br />move to brainstorming ideas from individual members, developing a list that strategic choices could <br />15 <br />then be built up to address HRA strengths and how to build focus moving forward. As part of that list, <br />16 <br />Ms. Raye referenced e-mails received to-date from individual members, with Ms. Kelsey distributing <br />17 <br />them as a bench handout as well. <br />18 <br />19 <br />Member Maschka addressed his priorities: addressing the hotel/motel study; improve business retention <br />20 <br />efforts; and continue the NEP and CEP programs. <br />21 <br />22 <br />Member Etten noted one area of specific focus of both the HRA and City Council was the SE Roseville <br />23 <br />issues and many specifics within that initiative that remained unresolved. <br />24 <br />25 <br />Ms. Raye noted the coalition already organized for those efforts, and questioned if the HRA should be <br />26 <br />the lead or a member or stakeholder at the table. <br />27 <br />28 <br />Member Etten opined that the HRA becomes a part of the solutions in partnership with the coalition and <br />29 <br />involvement of staff from Roseville and other involved communities (e.g. Maplewood and St. Paul) as <br />30 <br />well as other law enforcement and public safety jurisdictions and agencies. Member Etten opined that <br />31 <br />the HRA’s part may involve helping to purchase or developer property; or run programs to enhance <br />32 <br />businesses or properties as goals are formed at the coalition level and obvious ways for the HRA to <br />33 <br />participate in moving those efforts forward. <br />34 <br />35 <br />At the request of Member Lee, Member Etten clarified that there is a coalition developing, with some of <br />36 <br />the stakeholders being staff from various communities, the school district, and Police Department <br />37 <br />Foundation; and as goals are formed, there would be areas identified for HRA investment, at which <br />38 <br />point the HRA could and would become more involved. Member Etten noted the HRA was already <br />39 <br />somewhat involved on a staff level with the HRA Executive Director and Community Development <br />40 <br />Director; and since this is in his neighborhood, advised that he had also been involved in some of the <br />41 <br />meetings held at the staff level. Member Etten advised that Ramsey County staff and commissioners <br />42 <br />had now been brought into the picture to discuss the development or redevelopment aspects; with other <br />43 <br />communities and their Councilmembers also involved in the process, as is the Roseville City Council. <br />44 <br />Member Etten noted that this problem area was not bound by walls of any one jurisdiction; and it would <br />45 <br />be a complicated process to make improvements moving forward. <br />46 <br />47 <br />At the request of Member Elkins, Member Etten advised that the boundaries or area for redevelopment <br />48 <br />or resolution had not yet been defied. Member Etten noted one area considered by the coalition for a <br />49 <br />specific project involved the corner location of the former ICO station property; however, that property <br />50 <br />had recently been sold to a private party for potential development as a gas station use. Member Etten <br />51 <br />opined there were many other things that can be accomplished; and encouraged ideas and specifics from <br />52 <br />anyone; including how to provide recreation or more green space in that SE area, such as a parcel of <br />53 <br />land that may be tucked in among apartment buildings, that could provide a recreation space; or <br />54 <br />community gardens for immigrant populations in those apartment buildings. <br />55 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.