My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2015-06-30 HRA_Special_Meeting_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Housing Redevelopment Authority
>
Minutes
>
2015
>
2015-06-30 HRA_Special_Meeting_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/4/2015 8:39:58 AM
Creation date
8/4/2015 8:39:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Housing Redevelopment Authority
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
6/30/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
HRA Special Meeting <br />Minutes – Tuesday, June 30, 2015 <br />Page 12 <br />1 <br />At the request of Member Elkins, Member Etten clarified that the area around the former Linders <br />2 <br />Greenhouse site had been redeveloped into a wetland area. Member Etten noted the involvement of <br />3 <br />many groups in this effort, including area sports organizations or associations, the school districts; with <br />4 <br />many pieces still to come together. However, Member Etten opined that the HRA can help in the <br />5 <br />future, but the specific pieces were not yet refined enough at this point to really identify exactly where <br />6 <br />any one group fit in. <br />7 <br />8 <br />Ms. Raye encouraged more ideas to add to the list already available on the flip chart. <br />9 <br />10 <br />Member Wall suggested the “business retention” priority be broadened to include “and recruitment,” <br />11 <br />and include talking to bigger developers about their clients and those looking to expand or add new <br />12 <br />operations. <br />13 <br />14 <br />Not intending to restrain the HRA, but Member Majerus questioned where the line was between <br />15 <br />economic development and HRA goals. which Member Etten agreed was a fair question. <br />16 <br />17 <br />Member Wall proposed taking on that economic development role and allocating resources toward it. <br />18 <br />19 <br />Member Raye suggested the HRA continue or expand individual property owner education/support <br />20 <br />moving forward. <br />21 <br />22 <br />Member Elkins spoke in support of continuing efforts for first-time homebuyer education. <br />23 <br />24 <br />Chair Maschka and Member Etten noted the HRA had expanded their educational workshops beyond <br />25 <br />the annual Living Smarter Home & Garden Fair to a year-round offering, which had proven very <br />26 <br />successful to-date. <br />27 <br />28 <br />As a first ring suburb, Ms. Raye noted that its smaller footprint ramblers were available for first-time <br />29 <br />homebuyers as seniors downsized; and asked the status of the previously-created remodeling handbooks <br />30 <br />and its application for millenials seeking more green space; and options available for them. Ms. Raye <br />31 <br />sought to clarify if the demand for them continued, or if they needed updated or resources allocated to <br />32 <br />maintain them. <br />33 <br />34 <br />Member Elkins noted the available of the Green Remodeling Plan Book as well as the Rambler and <br />35 <br />Split Vision idea books on the HRA’s website for reference. <br />36 <br />37 <br />As part of the revised HRA loan program, Chair Maschka opined that young families would be putting <br />38 <br />more money into those homes and use the revolving loan program as now improved. <br />39 <br />40 <br />Member Lee questioned how high the blight areas needed to percolate up. <br />41 <br />42 <br />Chair Maschka noted blighted warehouse areas, which were also under the HRA’s authority to address. <br />43 <br />44 <br />Specific to the annual Living Smarter Home & Garden Fair, Chair Maschka opined that needed to be on <br />45 <br />the list to decide whether to continue, contract out or discontinue in its current format. While it was a <br />46 <br />wonderful program, Chair Maschka noted it was n incredible drain on staff; and if continued, a better <br />47 <br />way to accomplish it needed to be identified. <br />48 <br />49 <br />Chair Maschka noted the need to identify sub-issues under “assembling parcels for development;” and <br />50 <br />the specific involvement or role of the HRA: whether developing RFP’s; how to develop the parcels; <br />51 <br />and identifying opportunities for the community’s benefit. Chair Maschka expressed concern that the <br />52 <br />first effort of the HRA at redevelopment – the Dale Street Project – ended up with interest only from <br />53 <br />non-profit developers. <br />54 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.