My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2015-07-21_HRA_Agenda_Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Housing Redevelopment Authority
>
Agendas and Packets
>
2015
>
2015-07-21_HRA_Agenda_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/4/2015 8:49:04 AM
Creation date
8/4/2015 8:48:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Housing Redevelopment Authority
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
HRA Meeting <br />Minutes – Tuesday, June 16, 2015 <br />Page 3 <br />1 <br />At the request of Member Wall, Mr. Foutz advised that students had been in frequent contact <br />2 <br />via e-mail with the Roseville Visitor’s Association (RVA), but he was not aware of their <br />3 <br />review of the final report. <br />4 <br />5 <br />Chair Maschka clarified that the RVA had received a copy of the materials provided tonight <br />6 <br />for the HRA, and he had spoken to Executive Director Julie Wearn earlier today, and she <br />7 <br />offered her ongoing cooperation with the HRA with this problem. <br />8 <br />9 <br />At the request of Member Wall, Mr. Foutz confirmed that students had worked throughout the <br />10 <br />process with Roseville Police Chief Rick Mathwig and Mr. Yunke, who were also present in <br />11 <br />tonight’s audience. <br />12 <br />13 <br />Member Wall referenced a past task force consisting of the Roseville Police Chief, City <br />14 <br />Manager, several City Councilmembers, Ms. Wearn, the Community Development Directors <br />15 <br />and others considering previous recommendations and their general consensus that many <br />16 <br />options were not feasible. Member Wall questioned if the City Council could impose zoning <br />17 <br />restrictions to make these establishments safe with penalties in place for violations. Member <br />18 <br />Wall opined it would be interesting to get feedback from the City Attorney on the practicalities <br />19 <br />of some of these recommendations and where difficulties may be encountered, opining there <br />20 <br />may be significant obstacles to enforce some of these recommended cures. <br />21 <br />22 <br />Mr. Foutz noted ordinances in the Cities of St. Paul and Minneapolis that were short, sweet <br />23 <br />and to the point addressing health, safety and welfare issues. <br />24 <br />25 <br />With Mr. Foutz unable to specifically address the success rate of enforcement in those cities, <br />26 <br />Member Wall opined that it would be interesting to see their successes, and also examples <br />27 <br />from other communities who have been successful in abating these problems. <br />28 <br />29 <br />Chair Maschka suggested that may be something for further review moving forward. <br />30 <br />31 <br />Member Majerus referenced the City of Chula Vista, CA example featured in the study and <br />32 <br />what they had undertaken to accomplish resolution to similar problems, and questioned their <br />33 <br />efforts that could provide some ideas going forward for the City of Roseville within the scope <br />34 <br />as a first-ring suburb. <br />35 <br />36 <br />Chair Maschka also questioned if that City was able to abate or remove any problem <br />37 <br />properties; with Mr. Foutz responding that the study had not found anything other than two <br />38 <br />major suburbs with a lodging ordinance addressing the issues. <br />39 <br />40 <br />Chair Maschka expressed his appreciation for the recommendations included in the study, <br />41 <br />noting their similarity to other efforts already undertaken by the City. <br />42 <br />43 <br />Member Majerus asked if students had accumulated any results locally, with Mr. Foutz <br />44 <br />responding that they found no one having done anything like this locally, but further noted the <br />45 <br />70% reduction in crime achieved by the City of Chula Vista, CA. <br />46 <br />47 <br />Mr. Waldron noted his favorable impression with the Ramsey County Attorney’s Office and <br />48 <br />their staff’s desire to be more aggressive in tackling this problem, based on the law <br />49 <br />enforcement background and safety perspective of some of that staffing involved. <br />50 <br />51 <br />Member Wall brought forth another theory in civil law, whether applied or not, holding a <br />52 <br />person responsible if turning a blind eye to ongoing crime, citing the recent similar charges <br />53 <br />brought against the Catholic Church. Member Wall questioned if this may provide another <br />54 <br />theory to pursue with hotel/motel owners rather than seeking management staff to address the <br />55 <br />situation, since they come and go so frequently. Member Wall encouraged the City Council to <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.