My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2015-07-21_HRA_Agenda_Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Housing Redevelopment Authority
>
Agendas and Packets
>
2015
>
2015-07-21_HRA_Agenda_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/4/2015 8:49:04 AM
Creation date
8/4/2015 8:48:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Housing Redevelopment Authority
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
HRA Meeting <br />Minutes – Tuesday, June 16, 2015 <br />Page 4 <br />1 <br />look at such issues seriously to seek the assistance of owners in preventing or forestalling <br />2 <br />further issues. <br />3 <br />4 <br />Member Masche opined this was a good report providing valuable information for the HRA. <br />5 <br />From a pure resource standpoint, Member Masche noted that the amount of time the Roseville <br />6 <br />Police Department spent protecting residents of hotels, or addressing those problems, the more <br />7 <br />it took away that resource from other citizens, whether they be residents, commercial or <br />8 <br />business owners, or other stakeholders in Roseville. Member Masche admitted his lack of <br />9 <br />awareness in the amount of time involved until these statistics were compiled as part of this <br />10 <br />study. <br />11 <br />12 <br />Member Etten thanked Mr. Foutz and students for this report; and asked that a version as <br />13 <br />provided in the presentation versus the version included in meeting materials be provided to <br />14 <br />staff for dissemination to the HRA and City Council, and publically going forward, since it <br />15 <br />appeared to provide more detailed information. Member Etten thanked the study group for <br />16 <br />reaching out to the Ramsey County Attorney’s office, noting the active involvement of County <br />17 <br />Attorney John Choi in addressing these issues. Member Etten opined that some of these items <br />18 <br />could easily be translated into existing City ordinance. Member Etten agreed that the owners <br />19 <br />needed to become involved since they had a financial stake rather than managers or part-time <br />20 <br />employees. Member Etten suggested the City apply sufficient heat within its boundaries to get <br />21 <br />the attention of motel/hotel owners in addressing these issues now rather than later, but <br />22 <br />suggested meeting informally with those owners and get them around the table seeking their <br />23 <br />willing cooperation as the first step. <br />24 <br />25 <br />Chair Maschka noted this may involve a role for the RVA as a stakeholder as well; with <br />26 <br />Member Etten concurring that they served as a tremendous asset to the community. Chair <br />27 <br />Maschka also noted the potential of using travel advisory sites via the internet as a potential <br />28 <br />tool for grading motels. <br />29 <br />30 <br />Chair Maschka recognized Police Chief Mathwig and Mr. Yunke for their comment regarding <br />31 <br />the study and hotel/motel situation in Roseville. <br />32 <br />33 <br />During his twenty-five years with the Roseville Police Department, Chief Mathwig reported <br />34 <br />that the situation with problem motels in the community was not much different than he’d <br />35 <br />initially found, but was now just more well-known. Chief Mathwig clarified that this situation <br />36 <br />did not involve the majority of the motels/hotels in the community, noting the cooperation of <br />37 <br />owners of the Motel 6 and Radisson establishments. Unfortunately, Chief Mathwig noted that <br />38 <br />the Radisson got spillover from other unseemly establishments. <br />39 <br />40 <br />However, Chief Mathwig advised that the City of Roseville had continued to deal with <br />41 <br />extremely unresponsive management at the Red Roof and Day’s Inn. Chief Mathwig noted <br />42 <br />that the owner of the Red Roof owned another establishment in a neighboring community, and <br />43 <br />in his consultations with their Police Chief, they had found the owner equally unresponsive. <br />44 <br />Chief Mathwig noted it was unfortunate that an ordinance was needed to deal with the few <br />45 <br />problem businesses, but asked that the HRA pursue making such a recommendation that he <br />46 <br />found necessary for enforcement with at least one of the owners. Chief Mathwig advised that <br />47 <br />he had made repeated attempts to get the attention and cooperation of the Red Roof owner to <br />48 <br />no avail; and while he typically does not attend search warrants, he made it a point to do so at <br />49 <br />these two problem hotels, since he could not trust what was going on there. Chief Mathwig <br />50 <br />asked that the HRA provide for, and stresses the importance of, a hammer to deal with these <br />51 <br />two establishments and their owners. <br />52 <br />53 <br />At the request of Member Wall as to the form of that hammer, Chief Mathwig responded that it <br />54 <br />needed to be a licensing hammer, opining that when you are unable to rent out a room because <br />55 <br />you can’t get your license approved, it served to prompt compliance. Chief Mathwig <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.