My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2015-07-28_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2015
>
2015-07-28_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/6/2015 10:35:10 AM
Creation date
8/6/2015 10:33:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
7/28/2015
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Roseville Public Works, Environment and <br />Transportation Commission <br />Agenda Item <br />Date: July 28, 2015 <br />Item Description: City Campus Solar Installation Proposal Review <br />Item No: 5 <br />Background: <br />Through the ongoing research into solar options for the City Campus, and after our unsuccessful <br />application for the Made in Minnesota grant funds, the PWET Commission recommended staff <br />pursue a large scale solar installation on one of our two large roofs, either the Public Works <br />Maintenance building roof or the Skating Center roof. <br />In early July, staff received two proposals in response to our Request for Proposal (RFP). The <br />proposals are attached. Based on the quick time for ownership and no upfront costs, City staff is <br />recommending that we enter into an agreement with Sundial Solar for a Power Purchase <br />Agreement system which the City will be able to purchase in the sixth year after the installation <br />with the use of a charitable contribution for a private sector third party. <br />Attached is a comparison of the two proposals as well as the full submittals from both of the <br />solar developers. The proposal from Sundial was much more detailed and contained several <br />tables with cost analysis and power production analysis. <br />The July agenda does not budget much time for the discussion of this item. Therefore staff <br />encourages members to contact staff directly before Tuesday night's meeting. Also, this item <br />could be tabled to the August meeting if the Commission felt more time was needed to review <br />and discuss the proposals. <br />Recommended Action: <br />Review City Campus Solar Installation Proposals and make a recommendation to the City <br />Council. <br />Attachments: <br />A. Proposal Summary <br />B. TruNorth Solar Proposal <br />C. Sundial Solar Proposal <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.