My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2015-09-01_PR Comm Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Parks & Recreation
>
Parks & Recreation Commission
>
Packets
>
2015
>
2015-09-01_PR Comm Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/27/2015 3:00:18 PM
Creation date
8/27/2015 3:00:15 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />50 Bilotta asked the Commission & staff about access opportunities, easement possibilities, ie. <br />· <br />51 greenway corridor. <br />52 Brokke mentioned that engaging a planning professional to work with citizens and staff to <br />· <br />53 look at access and opportunities in the area. <br />54 OBrien commented on how things seem to be moving fast, what is the timeline at Twin <br />· <br />55 Lakes? <br />56 Adjacent lands to the park are about 2 years out and are need in some site clean-up <br />o <br />57 and requiring more time. Current interests are a bit removed from the park area but <br />58 will eventually move closer to park. <br />59 Brokke commented how the regulating map helps us by identifying different needs <br />o <br />60 with different developments. <br />61 <br />62 <br />Twin Lakes Public Comment: <br />63 Annette Phillips voiced her interest in keeping the area well buffered. The Twin Lakes area is <br />· <br />64 a real jewel, the warehouses are not visually beautiful, but they are quiet. There are concerns <br />65 about potential parking lots very close to the park and encourage efforts to keep the park <br />66 pristine and safe. <br />67 Carol Tanning is concerned about the safety of walkers in the area. Carol feels the <br />· <br />68 development has the possibility of opening up properties to unsafe situations and is <br />69 concerned about those potential problems that could come in with further development. She <br />70 urges the City to keep the area safe. <br />71 Lacy commented that the lake and the area around the lake are her favorite part of living in <br />· <br />72 the area. There is lots of wild life and she is advocating for conserving the area. She is also <br />73 concerned about safety at the south side of lake. <br />74 Ron Tanning mentioned this is a park in need of access for everyone. Tanning also <br />· <br />75 mentioned the need for lighting and minimizing a closed in feeling. <br />76 <br />77 5. <br />FOLLOW UP ON JOINT MEETING WITH THE CITY COUNCIL <br />78 Brokke highlighted meeting minutes and council interests. <br />79 Golf Course operations review <br />· <br />80 Park Dedication Fees <br />· <br />81 Policy on use of Park Dedication Fees <br />o <br />82 Capital Items <br />83 Acquisitions <br />84 Discussion on Southwest Roseville properties <br />· <br />85 Fees: resident and non-resident <br />· <br />86 <br />87 Extensive discussion on Park Dedication fees and the possibility of considering a policy that <br />88 provides more direction on the use of park dedication fees. <br />89 <br />90 6. <br />UPDATE ON CEDARHOLM GOLF COURSE REVIEW <br />91 Phil, Jerry & Dave have been working with staff to review Golf Course operations and learn more <br />92 about the enterprise fund. <br />93 <br />94 Jerry briefed the commission on recent discussions and spoke to the workings of an enterprise fund. <br />95 An enterprise fund is required to cover all direct and in-direct costs plus capital items. Unfortunately, <br />96 the golf course will not be able to maintain the enterprise fund status going into the future, it is not <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.