2015-09-02_PC_Agenda_Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

PF15-010_RPCA_090215 Page 4 of 5 aggressive proposal and will present some long term maintenance that the new homeowners 96 should be aware of. 97 c. At this time, the Engineering department was not presented with any information for the 98 alignment or design of water and/or sanitary sewer infrastructure to serve the proposed 99 homes. A private sanitary sewer main and water main will be required that will then serve the 100 individual private services to each proposed home, and maintenance of these facilities will be 101 the responsibility of the Homeowners Association. Review and approval of this infrastructure 102 will occur through the building permit review process. 103 PUBLIC COMMENT 104 Planning Division staff has received one email, which is included with this RPCA as part of 105 Attachment D, and one phone call from a nearby homeowner who was curious about the 106 application and who expressed support for proposal if it meets the applicable standards (e.g., 107 storm water management, lot size, tree preservation, etc.) despite its perceived impacts on less 108 tangible things (e.g., neighborhood character). 109 CONCEPT REVIEW 110 On October 20, 2014, Mr. Mueller brought a sketch of his subdivision proposal to the City 111 Council for guidance as to what changes to the previous proposals would give Councilmembers 112 the confidence that a subsequent plat application would meet City requirements and not 113 compromise the health, safety, general welfare, convenience, and good order of the community. 114 The proposed sketch plan and the minutes of this discussion are included with this RPCA as 115 Attachment E, and a brief list of the Council’s direction follows. 116 • Lot lines must be perpendicular to street to conform to code: 117 the current plat proposal achieves this. 118 • Consider routing storm water to the City storm sewer system with less overland flow: 119 storm water is infiltrated into several basins distributed around the property rather than 120 flowing over land to one large basin. 121 • Consider a 32-foot wide street to allow parking on both sides rather than parking pads: 122 the current proposal accomplishes this. 123 • Minimize impervious surface while still accommodating adequate parking: 124 The drainage plan adequately accounts for two garage stalls and four driveway stalls per 125 lot in addition to a 32-foot wide street that would allow six cars parked along the south 126 side and seven more parked along the north side, for a total of 37 parking spaces (i.e., 127 9.25 parking spaces per lot). 128 • Be aware that storm water management needs may limit the number of lots: 129 the proposed storm water plan meets applicable standards for the 4-lot plat. 130 • Majority of Councilmembers favor a private street: 131 the proposal includes a private street 132