My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2015-09-02_PC_Agenda_Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
2015 Agendas
>
2015-09-02_PC_Agenda_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/3/2015 11:48:02 AM
Creation date
9/3/2015 11:40:43 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
243
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PF15-017_RPCA_090215 <br />Page 3 of 6 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />REVIEW OF INTERIM USE APPLICATION <br />To arrive at its recommendation, Planning staff considers the relevant code section, input gathered at <br />the open house, and comments from DRC members. In this case the Code Section is 1009.03: <br />The purpose statement for this section indicates that: Certain land uses might not be consistent with <br />the land uses designated in the Comprehensive Land Use Plan, and they might also fail to meet all <br />of the zoning standards established for the district within which they are proposed; some such land <br />uses may, however, be acceptable or even beneficial if reviewed and provisionally approved for a <br />limited period of time. The purpose of the interim use review process is to allow the approval of <br />interim uses on a case-by-case basis; approved interim uses shall have a definite end date and may <br />be subject to specific conditions considered reasonable and/or necessary for the protection of the <br />public health, safety, and general welfare. <br />Section 1009.03D of the City Code specifies that three specific findings must be made in order to <br />approve a proposed INTERIM USE (IU): <br />a. The proposed use will not impose additional costs on the public if it is necessary for the public to <br />take the property in the future. This is generally intended to ensure that a particular interim use <br />will not make the site costly to clean up if the City were to acquire the property for some purpose <br />in the future. In this case, the Planning Division understands that many of the semi-trailers are <br />currently loaded with clothes, furniture, and other items, which are the property of Goodwill <br />Industries. These trailers pose limited environmental risk to the City if it were to acquire the <br />site, so Planning Division staff believes that the IU would not have significant negative effects <br />on the land. That said, there is a financial burden tied to the removal of approximately 75 semi- <br />trailers, should the City be required to remove them. If the applicant began to store trailers that <br />contained other cargo, there could be additional environmental risks. <br />b. The proposed use will not create an excessive burden on parks, streets, and other public <br />facilities. Storage and staging of semi-trailers is viewed by the Planning Division to generate <br />limited impacts to the area, especially on the roadways. This area includes warehousing, <br />distribution, and motor freight transfer which is generally industrial. These uses (similar to that <br />proposed) tend not to generate traffic impacts in this area since the trailers sit unmoved for much <br />of the time. As such, the Division believes that the proposed IU would not constitute an <br />excessive burden on streets, parks, or other facilities, especially given the location. <br />c. The proposed use will not be injurious to the surrounding neighborhood or otherwise harm the <br />public health, safety, and general welfare. There were no concerns raised at the June 30, 2015, <br />open house regarding the IU for this property. The Planning Division staff believes that in the <br />short-term, proposed trailer storage would not be injurious to the surrounding neighborhood, <br />especially since the site would generate limited noise, does not deal with chemicals, and would <br />have limited vehicle movements on County Road C2 and Long Lake Road. The proposal does <br />have two issues that could potentially harm public health: 1) if the trailers were to contain items <br />that had the potential to leak hazardous materials that could become an environmental concern; <br />2) the Fire Marshal has indicated that the current trailer storage configuration is a fire hazard and <br />would be very difficult for the fire department to extinguish if a fire were to occur in the interior. <br /> The Fire Marshal has indicated that in order to reduce the fire danger, the IU should include the <br />requirement of a trailer parking plan that provides for stacking of no more than 2 trailers back-to- <br />back, minimum separation between trailers of 5 feet, and fire access lanes. It is also important <br />that the trailers remain locked and secured so that they do not become a magnet for crime.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.