Laserfiche WebLink
PF15-019_RPCA_Plat_090215 <br />Page 6 of 7 <br /> 159 <br />The next area of the PUD is a section discussing the overall development conditions. Here, staff 160 <br />will revise and renumber the sub-sections to better address current Code requirements and 161 <br />aspects of the proposed development that require heightened attention. The areas of focus in the 162 <br />current PUD include Mitigation of Impact of Adjacent Uses, Storage, Site Constriction and 163 <br />Fencing, Landscaping and Landscape Guarantee, Trash Handling, Service and Delivery, Off-164 <br />Street Parking, Signage, Lighting, Anticipated Development Schedule, and Transit. Since the 165 <br />Zoning Code was amended in 2010, some of these items have changed both in regulation, as 166 <br />well as title, and the Planning Division will assess whether other items need to be incorporated 167 <br />into the amended PUD as it moves forward. 168 <br />Another component of this proposal deals with traffic generation. JLL had their consultant 169 <br />complete a traffic study that has been provided to the City Engineer for review. Generally, the 170 <br />proposed addition and out lots are generating few new trips to the mall, however, the volumes 171 <br />generated do impact some of the existing intersections at the mall and surrounding area. The 172 <br />City Engineer has been in contact with Ramsey County and MnDOT regarding the proposed 173 <br />improvements and the traffic management plan for the area. Based on the proposal, there may be 174 <br />some required traffic mitigation that will be the responsibility of JLL. 175 <br />Similarly, the City Engineer has been discussing storm water management with the applicant’s 176 <br />consultant, since the proposal calls for the existing system to be replaced in a new location. The 177 <br />site improvements will be required to meet current watershed and City requirements for storm 178 <br />water management, and the City has had initial discussions with JLL on providing additional 179 <br />storm water management, which additional cost would be the responsibility of the City. 180 <br />PUBLIC COMMENT 181 <br />At the time this report was prepared, Planning Division staff has not received any 182 <br />communications from members of the public about the proposal. 183 <br />RECOMMENDED ACTION 184 <br />1. By motion, recommend approval of the proposed preliminary plat of Lots 1, 2, and 3, 185 <br />Block 1, Rosedale Fifth Addition at 1700 County Road B2 and 1705 Highway 36, based on 186 <br />the comments and findings of this report, and subject to the following conditions: 187 <br />a. The Public Works Department shall approve easements, grading and drainage, storm 188 <br />water management, and utility requirements as necessary to meet the applicable standards 189 <br />prior to the approval of the final plat or issuance of permits for site improvements; 190 <br />Tenant Gross Floor Area (gfa) Required Parking <br /> <br />Macy’s 259,453 798 <br />J.C. Penney 155,916 480 <br />Herberger’s 138,721 427 <br />The Plaza 123,708 381 <br />Interior mall 393,904 1,212 <br />2015 Proposal 141,000 434 <br />Proposed out parcel <br />Developments (5) 35,000-40,000 150-500 <br />AMC Theater 2,500 seats 625 <br /> <br />Total Required Parking 4,857 <br />Parking Currently Provided 5,759