My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2015_0817
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2015
>
CC_Minutes_2015_0817
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/21/2015 4:29:15 PM
Creation date
9/16/2015 11:08:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
8/17/2015
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,August 17,2015 <br /> Page 6 <br /> ble, including subsidies, recovery of fixed costs and recovery mechanisms, and <br /> what made the most sense and provide the greatest transparency. Commissioner <br /> Byrne concluded that based on her experience, the current municipal rates in Ro- <br /> seville achieved something not available for the public utility sector at the De- <br /> partment of Commerce in getting very close to the cost of delivery. Based on this <br /> thorough review, Commission Byrne advised that the Commission was offering <br /> no specific recommendations to change 2016 rates, and if the City Council had <br /> specific areas they wished the Commission to pursue going forward for 2017 and <br /> beyond, sought their feedback accordingly. <br /> Council Responses/Discussion <br /> Financial policies (Attachment A) <br /> Mayor Roe expressed his interest in recommended changes and new language, <br /> and expressed appreciation for some of the additions, especially within the capital <br /> investment policy. <br /> Councilmember McGehee questioned if she had missed a recommendation for us- <br /> ing cost benefit analyses; with Councilmember Etten noting it was included but <br /> not called out specifically as a change to the language. <br /> Under the new policy, Commissioner Rohloff identified that analysis for future <br /> development proposals, and language related to fiscal analysis identifying uses <br /> and demonstrating costs and benefit, with the cost of that analysis borne by the <br /> developer. <br /> Mayor Roe noted that the cost-benefit language had been added to the City's poli- <br /> cies at the initiation of Councilmember Ihlan a few years ago and thanked the <br /> Commission for adding that as a policy and bringing it forward, even though he <br /> wasn't sure how well it was being followed at this point. <br /> At Councilmember Laliberte's notice regarding striking of "monthly" updates <br /> from the policy, Chair Schroeder clarified that the City Council may not always <br /> get monthly updates, but sometimes they may be quarterly or on another <br /> timeframe, and this policy provided some flexibility for the City Council to ad- <br /> dress specific situations to determine what their preference was. <br /> Mayor Roe suggested retaining"regular,"AND "annual" in the revised language. <br /> At the request of Councilmember McGehee, Chair Schroeder clarified that the <br /> scope of the CIP was for twenty years out, with an annual review to provide a suf- <br /> ficient projection. <br /> On page 2 of the CIP, Councilmember Etten noted referenced to the "Park Capital <br /> Maintenance Fund," and asked if that was intended to replace the PIP. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.