Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, September 14, 2015 <br />Page 20 <br />forts. Coiincilmember Etten expressed concern that the City Council may paint <br />itself into a corner unless it chose to abandon other priorities of the City Council; <br />and while moving toward a different type of entity, it may include many possibili- <br />ties, but also would be a challenge to make it work. <br />Councilmember McGehee recognized the concerns expressed by Councilmember <br />Etten, suggesting an advis6ry commission role in order not to lose the background <br />and experience of current Roseville HRA ineinbers. Councilmember McGehee <br />suggested two separate economic development and housing advisory coinmis- <br />sions charged accordingly and given direction for specific projects the City Coun- <br />cil wanted to achieve in certain areas (e,g. Old Highway 8 Project) to oversee <br />those efforts in a reasonable fashion. Councilmeinber McGehee opined that a <br />process similar to that used for the Dale Street Project, with the Roseville HRA <br />performing the foundational work, with the contracts and legal work moving onto <br />the City Council to finish it up. Councilmember McGehee opined that such a <br />process was preferred to address legal worlc and avoid confusion in the market <br />place with developers. Councilmember McGehee further opined that developers <br />would quickly learn a clear path through the Community Development Depart- <br />ment, and that it would work better and provide more than adequate power for the <br />City Council in its PA, and would keep taxing, levy and bonding authority under <br />elected officials, while still allowing funding for other conunission program <br />needs. <br />Councihnember Willmus observed a desire of his colleagues to look at a different <br />model; and sought to provide a clear direction for staff and Roseville HRA mem- <br />bers froin tonight's discussion if the majority of Councilmembers thinlc the exist- <br />ing model was no longer achieving the goals of the City on the economic devel- <br />opment focus aspect moving forward. <br />Individual Councilmember Position Statements <br />While stating that the current HRA model has done a good job for the City and <br />having no clear preference on a model moving forward, Councilmember McGe- <br />hee opined that another model may allow the City to move forward more effec- <br />tively. <br />Councilmember Laliberte opined that it would be good to provide clear direction <br />tonight on the existing model. However, Councilmember Laliberte stated she was <br />not sure she was ready to state a specific model moving forward, even though see- <br />ing the options available and recognizing the need for more focus on economic <br />development and cross-over with economic developinent and housing foci. <br />Councilmember Laliberte further opined that the current Roseville HRA model <br />was no longer able to or has not addressed that economic development focus up to <br />this point; and therefore she would be in favor of pursuing another option as a <br />model moving forward. <br />