My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2015_1019_AmendedCCpacket
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2015
>
2015_1019_AmendedCCpacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/21/2015 3:10:27 PM
Creation date
10/19/2015 9:59:21 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment B <br />Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, June 22, 2015 <br />Page 18 <br />Councilmember Laliberte opined that the SWOT analysis provided good infor- <br />mation, much of which didn't rise to the final document, but worth reviewing, and <br />recommended that should be done on an annual basis moving forward. Coun- <br />cilmember Laliberte suggested a swift review of the SWOT document be per- <br />formed each January as part of the organizational meeting. <br />Councilmember Comments/Feedback <br />Councilmember McGehee <br />In response to Councilmember Laliberte, Councilmember McGehee agreed with <br />her comments regarding civic engagement and effective governance, and empha- <br />sized her concurrence that both are cultural and under individual control. In terms <br />of transparency, Councilmember McGehee suggested the development of policies <br />addressing a known and clear process inviting specific elements of a neighbor- <br />hood ar other or civic participation opportunity. If those policies are not built into <br />programming, Councilmember McGehee opined it would continue to be incon- <br />sistent on only complaint-driven. <br />Regarding move-up housing, Councilmember McGehee opined a good discussion <br />had been held at the Retreat about that, and when she considers the twenty new <br />units and their price point as part of the revised Dale Street Project, she thought <br />that could be removed from the list once they're constructed. <br />Councilmember McGehee agreed that she didn't like the checklist approach ei- <br />ther, and while agreeing this had been a good exercise, some things had come out <br />of the Retreat that did not become part of the final report, nor had they been dis- <br />cussed in any meaningful way even though she found the overall discussion to be <br />good. <br />Councilmember McGehee agreed with the need to shine a light on the asset man- <br />agement program for continue monitoring and subsequent completion. <br />In terms of civic engagement, Councilmember McGehee opined that the City <br />Council and City still had a long way to go, but the checklist would not get any- <br />one there, and required a cultural shift. Agreeing that outreach was a fine initia- <br />tive, Councilmember McGehee opined that it needed to be to everyone, not only <br />targeting a specific group, but across the board. <br />Whether or not an employee survey is done, Councilmember McGehee opined <br />that it was important for the City Council to understand staff jobs. Councilmem- <br />ber Member McGehee suggested that may be accomplished through the City <br />Manager proposing a policy for consistent exit interviews; and how to provide <br />enough steps within each department to satisfy employees as they grow in their <br />career. Councilmember McGehee stated she would defer to the City Manager on <br />this topic, and if he felt a survey was needed he could provide information going <br />forward to establish a policy. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.