My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2015_1019_AmendedCCpacket
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2015
>
2015_1019_AmendedCCpacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/21/2015 3:10:27 PM
Creation date
10/19/2015 9:59:21 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment B <br />Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, June 22, 2015 <br />Page 19 <br />Councilmember McGehee suggested a project template going forward, with min- <br />imal tweaking and similar to the Dale Street process, that would go a long way <br />toward civic engagement and organizational effectiveness. While understanding <br />the need to do so as part of the budget process and allowing Department Heads to <br />know City Council expectations for major focus items, Councilmember McGehee <br />noted there were other policy issues for departments. <br />Councilmember Etten <br />Councilmember Etten expressed appreciation of many of the ideas expressed in <br />Councilmember Laliberte's "white paper," and suggested taking items and mak- <br />ing revisions that would essentially prioritize those priorities. Councilmember Et- <br />ten stated that he really liked Councilmember Laliberte's idea of having fewer <br />priorities and monthly updates, even perhaps some quarterly as applicable, but <br />keeping them in front of the City. Councilmember Etten clariiied that the purpose <br />is not meant to direct all city operations and services, but those few areas the City <br />Council wanted to specifically focus on. <br />Councilmember Etten opined that housing and redevelopment was important for <br />Roseville as the market continued to improve and the City to transition. Coun- <br />cilmember Etten also spoke in support of the need to look at how to task advisory <br />commissions and boards with meaningful activities. Specific to housing and re- <br />development efforts, Councilmember Etten opined that this was largely up to the <br />HRA and City Council working together to flesh out the targets and strategic ini- <br />tiatives currently listed on the right side of the document; with continual adjust- <br />ment over time as citizens and advisory commissions bring new information for- <br />ward for the City Council's and HRA's attention. <br />Specific to civic engagement, Councilmember Etten suggested changing the stra- <br />tegic priority to "Community Outreach." Councilmember Etten noted that the <br />CEC had already been tasked with many of these items, and had asked to be given <br />the opportunity to address them in this important role. While supporting volun- <br />teer opportunities, Councilmember Etten noted the need for more public input <br />about how to get more new people involved. <br />Noting his total support of participation by underrepresented groups in the com- <br />munity, Councilmember Etten noted the need to continually and further address <br />immigrant populations and apartment dwellers as part of that process and as a vi- <br />tal part of the community. Councilmember Etten opined that those initiatives <br />could be addressed as part of the role of advisory boards and commissions. <br />Regarding infrastructure sustainability, Councilmember Etten opined that it fell <br />into so many departments, and under the adopted CIP. Councilmember Etten <br />opined that from his perspective, updating the CIP and adopting those updates in <br />2016 from the original 2012 document was a necessary step and would provide a <br />more accurate document with those updates four years after inception. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.