My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2015-10-27_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2015
>
2015-10-27_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/27/2015 11:18:53 AM
Creation date
10/27/2015 11:15:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
10/27/2015
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
79 the general public as had been realized on LRT lines and creating an additional <br />80 police presence and/or payment of fares by all riders. <br />81 <br />82 In conclusion, Mr. Culver advised that Metro Transit would continue reviewing <br />83 ridership and other areas of the operation to ensure effective routing between <br />84 branch lines feeding into this BRT system, similar to review of existing green line <br />85 routes along University. Mr. Culver noted City staff s continued advocacy and <br />86 monitoring of how to enhance County Road B and Larpenteur Avenue routes to get <br />87 more riders to BRT stations; and advised that staff would continue to periodically <br />88 update the PWETC if and when Metro Traeof <br />de significant changes or <br />89 advances in that area. <br />90 <br />91 6. Sanitary Sewer System Review and DiscussionitaryServices <br />92 Acting Chair Wozniak briefly summarized meeting minutes from the j oint meeting <br />93 of the PWETC and City Council in June of 2015 listing the interest points and City <br />94 Council charge to the PWETC specific to this discussion. <br />95 4W '111111W <br />96 Mr. Culver introduced the discussion by providing an overview of sanitary sewer <br />97 services and components; typical areas for problems to develop within or along <br />98 those service lines and mains; and options for residents experiencing problems <br />99 under the City's current ownership policy. <br />100 <br />101 Mc. Culver presented a graphic synopsis via a Power1� ' presentation, attached <br />102 hereto and made a part hereof; outlining existing cInt ide sanitary sewer and <br />103 Metropolitan Council trunk interceptor sewer mains ad lines throughout the City. <br />104 Mr. Culver noted that the vast majority of the sanitary sewer system in Roseville <br />105 was installed in the 1960's, making it now 60 years old; and also a majority of those <br />106 lines were of clay piping. Given the age and deterioration of piping found in the <br />107 system,Mr. Culver advised that the City had started an aggressive sewer line <br />108 televising a ing program; with approximately 30 miles lined to -date of the total <br />109 approximate 0 miles of sanitary sewer pipes in the community. Mr. Culver <br />110 advised that approximately 67 miles of pipe annual is budgeted, leaving a <br />111 considerable way to go, with approximately 80 miles of clay pipe left to televise <br />112 and/or line. Mr. Culver noted that newer lines installed were constructed of PVC, <br />113 lined pipe,,i�lllllll iron or concrete pipes. <br />114 <br />115 At the reques e Chair Wozniak, Mr. Culver advised that generally spot pipe <br />116 replacements ar one if there is a collapse in one segment or if there is an offset <br />117 pipe, otherwise lining is being done wherever possible as a less invasive and costly <br />118 technique. At the further request of Member Wozniak, Mr. Culver advised that <br />119 areas being replaced generally follow the annual Pavement Management Program <br />120 (PMP) with the concept of performing maintenance before repaving a street, with <br />121 televising pipes the first process to determine if they're good candidates for lining, <br />122 which is being found to be the case. However, for those pipes that cannot be lined <br />123 for one reason or another, Mr. Culver advised that those spots were identified for <br />124 open cut with the remainder of the pipe lined. Mr. Culver noted that often televising <br />Page 3 of 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.