Laserfiche WebLink
� ss Bicycle Parking. The DEVELOPER shall provide/install bicycle racks, lockers, and/or lock- <br />� 84 up for a minimum of 50 bicycles distributed in the Retail Addition, Parking Deck, and al] <br />� 85 main Rosedale Mall entrances, in accordance with the Access, Circulation, and Parking Plan. <br />186 <br />187 <br />188 <br />189 <br />190 <br />191 <br />192 <br />193 <br />194 <br />195 <br />196 <br />197 <br />198 <br />199 <br />200 <br />201 <br />202 <br />PedestNian CiYculation and Access. The requirements set forth in City Code Section <br />1019.14 shal] apply, as modified by the Rosedale Road, Access, Circulation, and Parking <br />Plan. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION <br />At the duly notice public hearing on September 2, 2015, no members of the public were in <br />attendance to address the Planning Commission regarding this item, and Commissioners did not <br />have any speciiic questions of staff regarding the PUD amendment (Attachment C). <br />The Planning Commission voted 5-0 to recommend approval of the PUD amendment subject to <br />the following conditions: <br />a. Change in legal description from Lot 4, Block 1, Rosedale Center Fourth Addition (Torrens <br />Property — Certificate of Title No. 375111) Lot 3, Block l, Rosedale Center Fourth Addition, <br />except that part of overlying Lots 6 and Lot 7, Blocic 5, Leinen Heights Number 2(Torrens <br />Property — Certificate of Title No. 375ll 1) That part of Lot 3, Block 1, Rosedale Center <br />Fourth Addition, that overlies Lot 6 and Lot 7, Block 5, Leinen Heights Number 2(Abstract <br />Property) to Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 1, Rosedale Center Fifth Addition. <br />b. The City shall determine the required on-site parking for Rosedale and incorporate these <br />requirements into the amended PUD Agreement. <br />203 c. All applicable sections of the current PUD Agreement shall be modified to account for the <br />204 2010 zoning requirements. <br />205 d. The City Engineer, Ramsey County, and MnDOT shall all approve the traffic management <br />2os plan and improvements prior to the issuance of a building permit for the leasable space. <br />207 There may be some required traffic mitigation costs to be paid by the developer, associated <br />2os with these improvements. <br />209 <br />210 <br />211 <br />212 <br />RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION <br />Adopt a resolution approving PUD Agreement #15-019 governing the expansion of Rosedale <br />Center, attached as Attachment F and subject to City Attorney examination and approval of title <br />ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS <br />2� s Pass a motion to table the item for future action. Tabling beyond December 25, 2015, will <br />2�4 require consent by the Developer (JLL) as the City has used it 60-day extension covering <br />2�5 October 26 through December 25. <br />2�s By motion, recommend denial of the proposal. A recommendation to deny should be <br />2� T supported by specific iindings of fact based on the Planning Commission's review of the <br />2�8 application, applicable City Code regulations, and the public record. <br />Prepared by: City Planner Thomas Paschke 651-792-7074 � thomas.paschke@cityofroseville.com <br />Attachments: A: Area map E: PUD Agreement #3608 <br />B: Aerial photo F: Draft PUD Agreement 15-019 <br />C: PC minutes 090215 G: Draft PUD Resolution <br />D: Proposed development plans <br />PF15-019 RCA_PUD_1ll615 (2).doc <br />Page 6 of 6 <br />