Laserfiche WebLink
53 <br />54 <br />55 <br />56 <br />57 <br />58 <br />59 <br />60 <br />61 <br />62 <br />63 <br />64 <br />65 <br />66 <br />67 <br />68 <br />69 <br />70 <br />71 <br />72 <br />73 <br />74 <br />75 <br />76 <br />77 <br />78 <br />79 <br />80 <br />81 <br />82 <br />83 <br />84 <br />85 <br />86 <br />87 <br />88 <br />89 <br />90 <br />91 <br />92 <br />93 <br />94 <br />95 <br />96 <br />97 <br />98 <br />99 <br />100 <br />101 <br />102 <br />103 <br />104 <br />105 <br />106 <br />107 <br />108 <br />Attachment C <br />In conclusion, and as detailed in the staff report, Mr. Paschke advised that staff recommended <br />approval of the Preliminary Plat as conditioned, and amendment of PUD Agreement 3608. <br />Commissioner Questions of Staff <br />Member Stellmach asked staff to explain traffic mitigation and whether this project would incorporate <br />improvements to bicycle and pedestrian access in this area. <br />Mr. Paschke advised that as part of staff's review of the site, they would look to connect pedestrians <br />from County Road B-2 for better access to the Rosedale Center site and surrounding area as <br />applicable and as easily for them as possible with the fewest traffic conflicts. As far as broader traffic <br />issues on County Road B-2, Mr. Paschke advised that staff would address existing concerns and <br />issues, and suggest potential ways to remedy them as part of this proposal. <br />At the request of Member Murphy, Mr. Paschke advised that the parking ramp was proposed at one <br />level by modifying of the elevation, estimating it to be 12' to 15' off the ground, and connecting J. C. <br />Penney's and the new additional. With Member Murphy noting the maximum height allowed at 65 in <br />RB zoning districts, Mr. Paschke stated that he anticipated the ramp to be much lower than that <br />maximum allowable. <br />With the addition of more impervious surface with this addition and site changes, Chair Boguszewski <br />asked staff to review their Condition "B" in more detail and additional stormwater management for the <br />broader area. <br />Mr. Paschke advised that as part of the redevelopment project, the applicant would be required to <br />meet existing standards under current requirements of City Code and the area watershed district <br />versus pre-existing or previous standards. Regarding the broader area component, Mr. Paschke <br />noted that this area was already problematic and the City would ask the applicant, JLL, to work with <br />the City and watershed district to create additional capacity within their stormwater pond to hold more <br />water back and avoid any downstream issues, and as a cost-share opportunity as part of the <br />improvements. <br />Public Works Director/City Engineer Mark Culver agreed with Mr. Paschke's assessment, noting that <br />any improvements or disturbed areas, such as this proposed project, required the applicant and City <br />of Roseville to work with the watershed district for mitigation efforts. As Mr. Paschke noted, Mr. <br />Culver noted that this was a problem area as far as capacity of pipes north of the Rosedale Center, <br />and while making no guarantees of what may occur, City staff was looking forward to the opportunity <br />to partner with JLL and the watershed district to expand required stormwater management and <br />mitigation to benefit the area north or upstream of the Rosedale Center. <br />At the request of Member Murphy, Mr. Culver advised that there would be no long-term stormwater <br />flowing south along Fairview as a result of this improvement. Member Murphy noted that currently a <br />lake typically formed in that area during larger rainfall events. Mr. Culver noted that with more <br />capacity as anticipated, the City could relieve flow at one point that would facilitate drainage from <br />other points going north as well. <br />Applicant Representatives <br />Bill Mosten Senior P of Retail with JLL <br />Mr. Mosten noted there were other representatives of the Rosedale Center's management team in <br />the audience, as well as representatives from Dorsey/Whitney, and Kimley Horn. <br />Mr. Mosten advised that they were in agreement with staff's presentation, and expressed their <br />appreciation of staff's support and the applicant's excitement going forward. <br />At the request of Member Murphy, Mr. Mosten estimated the process, while the schedule was still <br />evolving, should be completed in approximately two years, either late in 2017 or early in 2018. <br />