My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2015_1116_CCpacket
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2015
>
2015_1116_CCpacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/21/2015 3:07:16 PM
Creation date
11/12/2015 4:19:40 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
300
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
31 6. Revise page 4, line 110, to read: L"Tree removal related to city [repairs of public <br />32 improvements]." <br />33 7. On page 7, line 220, any additional columns to the table need to be reflected in this portion of <br />34 text as well <br />35 8. On page 8, line 240 (example summary table), reverse symbols and revise height credit <br />36 inches at lower heights. Add a"Number of trees removed" column heading in the table to <br />s� highlight the effect of development versus reworking the basis of calculators. <br />38 9. On page 9, line 280: twealc language to remove "streets" while still addressing rights-of-way <br />39 and easement areas <br />40 10. On page 10, line 310, Section J.2.a, change text and table references to 3' versus 6' for <br />4� coniferous replacement tree DBH, text line 304 and table, line 313 <br />�2 11. On page 10, line 321, add language at end of sentence: "...guarantee [, according to Section <br />43 M(warranty requirement)" on line 397 for reference. <br />44 12. On page 11, lines 341-343, add comma followed by language: "...with priority given to <br />45 locations in or near the affected area." <br />46 13. Staff will review and revise how best to determine measurements based on species and their <br />4� respective representative values and height ranges. Staff will also revise the table (line 313) <br />4s to be more reflective of lower height ranges based on the consultant's field experience. <br />49 These changes were made to the draft ordinance that is attached as Attachment D. One <br />5o significant policy change that the Planning Commission recommended was to include all public <br />5� improvements in the tree preservation requirements (see section I.l .a, page 8 of Attachment D). <br />52 Most cities do not include public improvements due to the right-of-way or other constraints, and <br />5s because the City is always able to provide whatever tree replacement the City Council desires <br />54 without regulating itself. <br />55 SUGGESTED CITY COUNCIL ACTION <br />56 Adopt an Ordinance approving text amendments to § 1011.04 Tree Preservation and Restoration <br />5� in all Districts, of the Roseville City Code, that reflects the recommendation of the Planning <br />�� Commissioners and any modifications the City Council deems appropriate and applicable. <br />Prepared by: City Planner Thomas Paschke - 651-792-7074 � thomas.paschke@cityofroseville.com <br />Attachments: A: Consultant memorandum D: Draft with comments <br />B: PC minutes 100715 E: Draft ordinance <br />C: CC minutes 070615 & 082415 F: Summary ordinance <br />PROJ0017 TreePerservation RCA 111615.doc <br />Page 2 of 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.