2015_1116_CCpacket - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Attachment A City of Roseville 11-16-15 Page 5 (K) Tree Protection Required — Tree protection fencing requirements established in this section are largely similar to existing requirements with the following exceptions: a. We are proposing new pruning standards for oak and elm trees which include flexibility should pruning need to be done during prohibited time frames. b. We dis-incentivize after-the-fact/unplanned loss of trees by upping replacement rates by'h inch for every inch removed for each category of tree. c. If an unplanned tree is lost due to development, we are requiring the applicant to provide a planting plan showing how they will conform to the replacement penalty. (L) Certification of Compliance with Approved Landscape Plan — this is unchanged existing language. (M) Warranty Requirement — this is unchanged existing language. (N) Entry on Private Property and Interference with Inspection — this is unchanged existing language. Public Hearing The planning commission held a public hearing to obtain feedback on the regulations. While there were no comments from the public, the Planning Commission recommended a number of updates that are addressed in this final draft. Council Options 1. APPROVE THE ORDINANCE LANGUAGE AS PRESENTED OR WITH SPECIFIC EDITS; 2. TABLE THE ITEM and request additional information or changes to the proposed language. Attachments Following this memo, staff has provided two documents to (hopefully) make understanding and reviewing this ordinance easy. Attachment A: This is a clean copy of the proposed language to allow for easy reading of the ordinance. This copy also includes comments from this memo to explain specific provisions being proposed. Attachment B: REDLINED VERSION — shows edits between August and November. Attachment C: This is the official ordinance document you are asked to take action on tonight. Attachment D: This is a summary publication resolution for adoption if the Ordinance is approved.