My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2015_1019
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2015
>
CC_Minutes_2015_1019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/24/2015 1:37:01 PM
Creation date
11/13/2015 4:04:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
10/19/2015
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, October 19, 2015 <br />Page 9 <br />In reinforcing Finance Director Miller's comments, City Manager Trudgeon ref- <br />erenced the indices, and noting that peer communities are ranging between a min- <br />iinuin 2% to 2.5% COLA for non-union einployees, he supported a 2% COLA for <br />Roseville City employees as a fair adjustment. <br />At the request of Councilmeinber McGehee, City Manager Trudgeon reported on <br />reinaining union contracts yet to be settled and depending on negotiations in pro- <br />cess. <br />2016 Preliminar��et and Tax Levy <br />Based on previous discussions and to continue transparency efforts, Finance Di- <br />rector Miller reviewed new positions included in budget projections. Mr. Miller <br />noted that the tax levy impact was only $5,0000 as the reinainder of the proposed <br />positions would be fiinded by fees or other funding sources, including a signifi- <br />cant amount of non-local fiinding. The new positions were listed in the RCA, <br />page 6, lines 138 — 145. <br />Mr. Miller aslced that the City Council alert staff now before the final budget is <br />presented to the public and the City Council, that they provide staff with any addi- <br />tional feedbacic or present additional infonnation requests now in order to guide <br />discussions and recommendations between now and then. <br />City Manager Tnidgeon concurred, noting that the attempt was made to leverage <br />non-levy dollars to make the new positions happen and minimize impact on the <br />tax levy. <br />Councilmeinber McGehee requested additional infonnation on the Part-Time Parlc <br />Building Scheduler and further analysis based on current staff performing those <br />scheduling duties, comparison information on past and increased use of park facil- <br />ities by residents and non-residents, and fee disparities for those two groups. <br />Councilmember McGehee stated her concern was that Roseville residents are be- <br />ing asked to provide an unfair amount of subsidy for non-resident use of buildings <br />while those non-residents also do not pay city taxes that go toward uplceep and <br />maintenance, suggesting the non-resident fees may need to be adjusted according- <br />ly. <br />Without the benefit of that additional analysis, City Manager Trudgeon prelimi- <br />narily reported that the use of parlc buildings continued to be busy; and while a <br />report was planned year-end, staff could report now on current trends, depending <br />on what information was being requested (e.g. overhead and maintenance). Mr. <br />Tri.idgeon noted that the position would pay for itself through providing improved <br />rental scheduling and supervision; but opined with that better management reve- <br />nue could also be increased. Mr. Tri.idgeon offered to provide a breakdown of <br />that information, advising that staff had seen a spike in parlc building use from <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.