My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2015-11-24_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2015
>
2015-11-24_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2015 9:49:16 AM
Creation date
11/19/2015 9:42:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
11/24/2015
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
108
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
34 Abstentions: 1 (Wozniak) <br />35 Motion carried. <br />36 <br />37 Member Wozniak moved, Member Seigler seconded, approval of the September <br />38 22, 2015 meeting as amended. <br />39 <br />40 Corrections: <br />41 • Page 1, Line 10 (in accordance with Uniform Commission Code) <br />42 Correct to read: "absent" rather than "excused" <br />43 • Page 3, Line 110 (Wozniak) 11111lll161 <br />44 Correct to read: "...advised that approximately 6-7 miles of pipe annually] is <br />45 budgeted [for televising and or lining, leaving as many as 80 miles left to do.]" <br />46 <br />47 Ayes:5 <br />48 Nays:0 <br />49 Motion carried. <br />50 <br />51 Having not been at that meeting, and for future follow-up, Chair Stenlund asked <br />52 staff to break out the number of miles of each type of pipe construction constituted <br />53 the overall sanitary sewer infrastructure piping. <br />54 <br />55 Mr. Culver responded that the map as displa provided that pipe material <br />56 breakdown by mile. <br />57 <br />58 Chair Stenlund also asked for future discussion and public information, what <br />59 benefits a homeowner would gain — and options available — if they were more <br />60 proactive in maintenance and/or replacement of their private line before it became <br />61 an emer ency situation, based on the life s an of the particular pipe and age of the <br />62 line. <br />63 <br />64 nally, for fut eference, Chair Stenlund asked that as suggested at that meeting <br />65 ember Seig er a video or other communication method should definitely be <br />66 pu to showcase pathway and sidewalk improvements made rather than just <br />67 those ining left undone. Chair Stenlund asked if this would be an appropriate <br />68 video pr t for a high school class and then kept for future reference. <br />69 <br />70 Mr. Culver responded that the existing pathway map showed that projects <br />71 accomplished over the last five years, and could be defined to provide a radius area <br />72 around schools. <br />73 <br />74 Member Lenz suggested involving school districts as a partner in these efforts and <br />75 work accomplished to-date even though the City had not received any Safe Routes <br />76 to Schools grant funds. <br />77 <br />78 4. Communication Items <br />Page 2 of 18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.