My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2015-12-01_PR Comm Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Parks & Recreation
>
Parks & Recreation Commission
>
Packets
>
2015
>
2015-12-01_PR Comm Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/25/2015 11:28:42 AM
Creation date
11/25/2015 11:26:36 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
53 o Option #3: too small, drastic change on service level <br />54 • Holt reiterated that when we start reducing the size of the clubhouse we impact operations. <br />55 • O'Brien commented that she would hate to see Roseville shrink its vision and build <br />56 something that does not meet current needs. <br />57 • Brokke talked about the possibility of considering the Historical Society need for a <br />58 permanent home. Would a shared facility with the Golf Course make sense/work? <br />59 o Gelbach asked if the Council has identified funding for a Historical Society facility. <br />60 o Staff responded that nothing has been identified at this time. <br />61 • Stoner wrapped up the discussion by recommending that the Commission's plan when <br />62 talking with the Council should be a recommendation for Option #1 and a comment that <br />63 Option #4 is not recommended. <br />65 5. DISCUSS CITY COUNCIL JOINT MEETING <br />66 The joint meeting with the Council is scheduled for Monday, November 16. <br />67 • Commissioners suggested the two agenda items be switched so that the joint meeting starts <br />68 with a discussion of the Park Dedication Use of Funds Policy and end with a discussion on <br />69 Cedarholm Golf Course improvements. <br />70 • Brokke mentioned that the Finance Commission has yet to meet this month so there <br />71 recommendations/suggestions are not yet finalized but we have heard that; <br />72 o The Finance Commission feels $800,000 is appropriate, rather than the $1M the Parks <br />73 & Recreation Commission is suggesting. <br />74 o The Finance Commission feels the 2/3, 1/3 split is appropriate but that there should <br />75 be no adjustments if the land acquisition fund balance dips below the stated minimum <br />76 balance. <br />77 • Commissioners decided that all in attendance would participate in the discussions with the <br />78 Council and that Stoner will take the lead on the Park Dedication topic and Holt & Gelbach <br />79 will take the lead on the Cedarholm discussion. <br />80 <br />81 6. FEE DISCUSSION <br />82 Anfang highlighted portions of the Parks & Recreation Fee report for the Commission. <br />83 • The Cost Recovery Methodology is a nationally recognized system for categorizing fees <br />84 based on individual community's values and interests. <br />85 • The fee structure for recreation programs and facilities in many instances cover more than <br />86 direct costs, they also support administrative costs and liability insurance costs. <br />87 • Non-resident fees provide Roseville residents with expanded and enhanced opportunities. <br />88 Commissioners commented on the expanse and significance of the fees generated by all divisions <br />90 Within the Parks & Recreation department. <br />91 7. STAFF REPORT <br />92 Brokke spoke of: <br />93 • OVAL opening delayed 24 hours due to the warm fall we have had. OVAL officially opens on <br />94 Saturday, November 7. <br />95 • OVALuminations has been postponed to November 20. <br />96 • The 2016 Commission calendar has been included in tonight's packet. <br />97 • The Upper Villa Stormwater Retention Project has started. <br />98 • Met Council is planning a Sanitary Sewer Lining project for 2016 that could have impacts on <br />99 Valley and Villa Parks. <br />100 • Central Park Foundation contributed $80,000 to the recently installed playground in Central <br />101 Park, adjacent to the Foundation Shelter. This additional funding helped expand the play <br />102 structure and make it more accessible. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.