Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />9 <br />1y <br />12 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />47 <br />48 <br />49 <br />50 <br />51 <br />52 <br />ROSEVILLE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION <br />MEETING MINUTES FOR <br />NOVEMBER 5, 2015 <br />6:30pm <br />PRESENT: Becker -Finn, Bogenholm, Diedrick, Doneen, Gelbach, Heikkila, Holt, O'Brien, Stoner <br />ABSENT: Newby notified staff ahead of time of absence <br />STAFF: Anfang, Brold<_e, McDonagh <br />1. INTRODUCTIONS <br />2. ROLL CALL/PUBLIC COMMENT <br />No Public Comment <br />3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — October 6, 2015 MEETING <br />The October 6, 2015 minutes were approved unanimously with a correction to the name spelling on <br />line 110, the corrected spelling is Ellie Machura for Roseville resident. <br />4. CEDARHOLM GOLF COURSE REVIEW UPDATE <br />Brokke summarized commission packet materials, reviewed options and talked through financial <br />information. <br />Commission discussion followed: <br />• Stoner commented on how he liked how the deck costs & basement costs were broken out of <br />the overall cost of the building options. <br />• Stoner inquired into the functions of the basement options. <br />o McDonagh spoke about the need for storage of golf carts and other small equipment <br />& course items like benches. <br />• Holt suggested the future thinking approach would be to "build -out" the basement and set it <br />up for potential multi -use. <br />• Becker -Finn inquired into the ADA compliance. <br />o Staff responded that new construction would most definitely meet all ADA <br />requirements, a remodel that does not impact the structure of the facility would not <br />require ADA compliance be met. <br />• Holt added that maintaining what we have just does not make sense. <br />• Doneen also asked how far do we need to look before there is a realization that repairs are <br />not cost effective? <br />• Stoner also weighed in with the comment that repairs to the current building just kick <br />potential costs down the road and that these types of expenses are unpredictable. <br />• O'Brien inquired into how far the Council is willing to go with funding for this proposal. <br />• Holt mentioned that the Golf Course fund has a current balance of about $200,000 and that <br />plus park dedication funds could pay for the balance of this project. <br />• Gelbach reinforced the fact that the deck is an integral part of the Golf Course/Clubhouse <br />operation. <br />o Gelbach suggested adding the deck and basement costs to an option for a full package <br />price. <br />• Commissioners suggested the possibility of constructing the deck as a community build. <br />o Staff will look into this. <br />• Doneen suggested we look at the changes/impacts on golf course operations with the <br />different options presented. In summary; <br />o Option #1: meets current usage <br />o Option #2: downsizes service level <br />