2015_1207_CCpacket - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Attachment C 63 (5) PUD Qualifications 64 (a) Establishment of a PUD will be considered only for areas of land in single ownership or 65 control. Alternatively, multiple party ownership is acceptable when adequately secured 66 through a corporation, partnership, or other legal entity that will ensure the ability to 67 fulfill all of the obligarions of the PUD process including approvals, development, and 68 securities. 69 (b) �Projects eligible far a PUD shall have a site which consists of a parcel or contiguous 70 parcels of land two (2) acres or more in size. Tracts of less than two acres may be 71 governed by a PUD overlay district only if the applicant can demonstrate that a project of 72 superiar design can be achieved, or that greater compliance with the comprehensive plan 73 goals and policies can be attained through use of the PUD process. 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 (6) Permitted Uses within a PUD (a) �The extent of permitted land uses within a PUD shall be limited to those land uses that are either pennitted or deemed by the Community Development Department to be substantially similar to those allowed in the underlying zoning distric�. (b) �Adopted PUD overlay district regulations may include specific provisions governing uses which supersede underlying zoning requirements.l (e) IIvlore than one building may be placed on one lot in a PUD.I (7) �Areas of Flexibility� 82 Flexibiliry provided through a PUD will not to be approved simply to avoid adherence to 83 underlying zoning regulations, but instead must be used as a springboard to new and exciting 84 development that would not otherwise be possible utilizing existing zoning standards. Areas 85 of possible flexibility include: 86 (a) Building Placement — including zero ]ot ]ine construction subjecY to building code 87 allowances. Specifications and standards for lots and setbacks shall be at the discretion of 88 City Council, and shall encourage a desirable living or warking environment which 89 assists in achieving the goals set out far PUDs in Section (A)(1)(b). 90 91 92 93 94 (b) Trees/Landscaping Requirements — requires specialized landscaping plans that better address on-site needs and adjacent property concerns than would otherwise be required. (c) Open Spaces — provision of public open spaces that are enhanced with public art and other amenitics to provide a congregation area and a uniquc sense of place within the development. Page 3 of 13 i Comment [BGA9]: Many cities do not ' providc PUD options for smallcr tracts of land to p�rotect against PUD Ueing used as an � alternate to tl�e variance process. With this language, we set a minimum size limit at two � (2) acres, but keep the door open to smaller � PUDs IF thcy can achicvc one of two specific goals when compared to possible development � using underlying zoning: 1) a project of superior design; or 2) a project that beYter achieves goals listed in the comprehensive plan. We acknowledge this may need further edits to clearly de6ne when s�naller Yracts are eligible, but this seemed to be a good place to begin discussion. ,� Comment [BGA10]: Here we restrict uscs to those allowed by uvderlying zoning, but leave the door open for new uses if the Community Development Department deems a proposed use to be "substantially similar'" to an allowed use. This ensures that new industnes seeking a � home in Roseville could poYentially do so via PUD even if their specific use isn't defined in I� code. Comment [BGAll]: Whcreas subdivision � (a) states that uses wil] be limited to those allowed by underlying zomng subdivision (b) �I grants the City flexibility So tailor use restrict�ons to the PUD site and surroundings. i � i For example, current Roseville codes state that � i "no commercial t� ansact�ons" can occur at a mini-storage facility. This provision could I I potentially allow someone to proposed a mini- storage facility that includes a management ' office, sale of Uoxes and moving equipment, etc. The use hasn't changed, but the general regulations governing the use were tailored specifically for the site. Protection against I impacts to the surrounding proper[ies are built into the review �roccss to ensure that such changes are appropriate. Comment [BGA12]: Sambatek will work �� with staff to see if this language is nccessaiy as we understand there may already be provisions , for this within your ordinance. Gomment [BGA13]: The suggested areas of �ftexibility wara Caken direct9y �from thc feedback received at the project kick off meeting.