My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2015_1207_CCpacket
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2015
>
2015_1207_CCpacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/21/2015 3:03:26 PM
Creation date
12/3/2015 2:35:25 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
205
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
336 <br />337 <br />338 <br />339 <br />340 <br />341 <br />342 <br />343 <br />344 <br />345 <br />346 <br />347 <br />348 <br />349 <br />350 <br />351 <br />352 <br />353 <br />354 <br />355 <br />356 <br />357 <br />358 <br />359 <br />360 <br />361 <br />362 <br />363 <br />364 <br />365 <br />366 <br />367 <br />368 <br />369 <br />370 <br />371 <br />372 <br />373 <br />374 <br />Attachment C <br />3. Any deed restrictions, covenants, agreements, and articles of incorporation and <br />bylaws of any proposed homeowners' association ar other documents or <br />contracts which control the use or maintenance of property covered by the PUD. <br />4. A final staging plan, if staging is proposed, indicating the geographical sequence <br />and timing of development, including the esrimated start and complerion date for <br />each stage. <br />5. �CIp-to-date title evidence Ifor the subject property in a form acceptable to the <br />Community Devclopment Department. <br />6. Warranry deeds for Property being dedicated to the City for all parks, outlots, <br />etc., free from all liens and encumbrances except as otherwise waived by die Ciry <br />Council. <br />7. All easement dedication documents for easements not shown on the final plat <br />including those for Yrails, ingress/egress, etc., together with all necessary consents <br />to the easement by existing encumbrancers of the property. <br />8. Any other information deemed necessary by the Communiry Development <br />Department to fully present the intention and character of the PUD. <br />(iii) PUD Final Plan Review <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />The Community Devclopment Department shall generate an analysis of the final <br />documents against the conditions of PUD Preliminary Plan approval, and make a <br />recommendation as to whether all conditions have been met or if additional <br />changes are needed. <br />IThe Community Development Department shall finalize the ordinance to <br />establish the proposed overlay district for consideration by die Planning <br />Commission and City Council�. <br />The Planning Commission shall hold a�public hearing �on the proposed Overlay <br />District ordinance and Final PUD Plans, and shall subimit a recommendation to <br />the City Council far consideration. Because a PUD Preliminary Plan was <br />previously approved, the Planning Commission's recommendation shall only <br />focus on whether the Ordinance and PUD Fina] Plan are in substantial <br />compliance with the Preliminary PUD Plan and the required conditions of <br />approval. <br />�The Ciry Council shall then consider the recommendations of the Communiry <br />Development Deparnnent, the public, and the Planning Commission; and make a <br />decision of approval or denial, �n whole or in parrt�„ on the PUD Final Plan. A <br />denial shall only be based on findings that a PUD Final Plan is not in substantial <br />compliance with the approved PUD Preliminary Plan and/or the required <br />conditions of approval.l <br />�As a condition of PUD Final Plan approval, publication of the overlay district <br />ordinance shall be requiredprior to filing of the approved final plat. <br />Page l l of 13 <br />i <br />i/ <br />� <br />� <br />i Comment [BGA43]: Up to date title <br />evidence will ensure that all parties with an <br />interest in the land are subject to the <br />application which in turn protacts the City's <br />interest in easeme�ts and dedications being <br />made as part of the development. <br />� Gomment (BGA44]: Each new ordinance <br />' would be placed within the zoning code <br />ostensibly as new Chapters (inuch like the <br />"zoning overlay district for the Twin Lakes <br />Redevelopment Area is housed in Chapter <br />�022) <br />Comment [BGA45]: A second public <br />hea�ing will bc necded at PUD Final plan for <br />adoption of the overlay district ordinance. The <br />puipose of the hearing is to ensure the final <br />ordinance is addressing all details of <br />preliminary approval, and to ensure that final <br />plans are in proper ordcr. This hearing wil] <br />NOT address whether the PUD sl�ould move <br />forward or not that decision was ah eady made <br />at the PUD Preliminary Plan stage. <br />; Comment [BGA46]: Adding the phrase "in <br />� whole or in part" provides Council wiUi <br />tlexibility to move forward the portions of the <br />� project while others may need to come back <br />with furthcr corrections (rather than delaying <br />the entire project for details diat can be worked <br />out at a later time). <br />� GommenY [BGA47]: Sambatek will work <br />with staff to determine if we need to denote <br />voting requiremei�ts here. Per 1002.05, a 2/3 <br />vote of Council will be necessary for many <br />PUD votes. <br />� Comment [BGA48]: Publication of Che <br />ordinance must occm first so the plat, when <br />filed, will be in conzpliance with zoning. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.