Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, November 16, 2015 <br />Page 4 <br />gotiate and enter into an agreement for another storage facility in an amount not to <br />exceed $25,000 annually. <br />Councilmember Willmus asked that the term of the lease be only for 18 months at <br />the most, and not for 2-3 years; allowing for broader discussion on city storage <br />space needs and other issues coming into play as well. <br />Councilmember McGehee agreed with Councilmember Willmus, noting previous <br />discussions on purchase versus rental. While agreeing to a lease term for a stor- <br />age facility of up to 18 months, Councilmember McGehee opined that the city had <br />been aware of the need for space with given potential demolition of the Hagen <br />building for at least 3-4 years. Councilmeinber McGehee further opined that oth- <br />er options should have already been pursued during that time, fiirther opining that <br />rushing into a lease agreement now without much planning wasn't terribly im- <br />pressive. <br />At the request of Councilineinber Etten, City Manager Trudgeon responded that <br />the major storage items included large seasonal equipment and inachines, as well <br />as materials and supplies (e.g. piping). At the further request of Councilmember <br />Etten, Mr. Trudgeon responded that much of it would require a facility with larger <br />warehouse/garage dock doors to facilitate access. <br />Public Worlcs Director Marc Culver provided additional feedback based on this <br />discussion, particularly about the type of equipment/machinery being stored, in- <br />cluding street sweepers, lawn mowers and other summer equipinent used to main- <br />tain vegetation around storm water ponds, as well as water/sewer distribution <br />equipment. <br />Regarding lease terms, Mr. Culver reported that staff was certainly atteinpting to <br />get as short of a lease term as possible. However, Mr. Culver reported that on the <br />previous site, the property owner was hesitant to agree to less than a 3 year term, <br />and staff had to push for the 2 year term by indicating to thein that the property <br />owner would not need to reinvest much in the space during the City's use as it <br />was mostly for storage versus office use. Mr. Culver said there was still transition <br />costs for the building owners, and noted that the property owner was still loolcing <br />to recoup those costs for a ininiinum term. <br />Mr. Culver stated that staff was very interested in the broader discussion on short- <br />and long-term storage needs, along with other issues on the table, and what was <br />best for the City's inside and exterior storage needs. Mr. Culver noted this would <br />vary depending on whether a vacant lot was available as a solution or an existing <br />building needing to be rehabbed. Therefore, Mr. Culver clarified that staff would <br />continue to advocate for a 2 year lease and if a longer term was needed, would re- <br />quest a year-to-year lease beyond that. However, with the current competitive <br />