My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2015-12-02_PC_Agenda_Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
2015 Agendas
>
2015-12-02_PC_Agenda_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/14/2015 11:58:34 AM
Creation date
12/14/2015 11:58:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
12/2/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
P <br />ROPOSAL <br />6 <br />United Properties proposes to subdivide the property into two lots. It plans to develop Lot 1, <br />7 <br />Block 1, Applewood Pointe of Roseville at Central Park as a 105-unit senior cooperative and to <br />8 <br />sell Lot 2 of the same to the City to preserve the Owasso Ballfields. The proposed preliminary <br />9 <br />plat documentation is included with this report as Attachment C. <br />10 <br />When exercising the so-- on a plat request, the role of the City is <br />11 <br />to determine the facts associated with a particular request and apply those facts to the legal <br />12 <br />standards contained in the ordinance and relevant state law. In general, if the facts indicate the <br />13 <br />application meets the relevant legal standards and will not compromise the public health, safety, <br />14 <br />and general welfare, then the applicant is likely entitled to the approval. The City is, however, <br />15 <br />able to add conditions to a plat approval to ensure that the likely impacts to parks, schools, roads, <br />16 <br />storm sewers, and other public infrastructure on and around the subject property are adequately <br />17 <br />addressed. Proposals may also be modified to promote the public health, safety, and general <br />18 <br />welfare, and to provide for the orderly, economic, and safe development of land, and to promote <br />19 <br />housing affordability for all levels. <br />20 <br />PPA <br /> <br />RELIMINARY LAT NALYSIS <br />21 <br />As a preliminary plat of multi-family-zoned property, neither the zoning nor subdivision codes <br />22 <br />establish minimum requirements for area or width of lots, but the proposal is subject to the <br />23 <br />easement standards of the subdivision code, established in Chapter 1103 (Design Standards) of <br />24 <br />the City Code. <br />25 <br />City Code §1103.04 (Easements): <br /> Drainage and utility easements 12 feet in width, centered on <br />26 <br />side and rear property lines, are required where necessary. The proposed plat meets this <br />27 <br />requirement. <br />28 <br />staff has completed a traffic study that considered the impact of both <br />29 <br />the Applewood Pointe project and the Cherrywood project at Lexington and Woodhill and did <br />30 <br />not find anything irregular or of concern regarding the need for additional traffic improvements <br />31 <br />for either project. <br />32 <br />City staff has discussed a number of Code items regarding the Applewood project and will <br />33 <br />continue to work with United Properties as it begins the formal process of site design. <br />34 <br />Attachment D is the conceptual site plan, which indicates building placement, parking lots and <br />35 <br />landscaping, including trees to be preserved. Although United Properties has not finalized a <br />36 <br />development plan, their goal is to save as many of the perimeter trees as possible. Because all <br />37 <br />development plans and necessary reviews would follow after final plat approval and the transfer <br />38 <br />of the park property to the City, they do not impact the request before the Planning Commission. <br />39 <br />Regarding park dedication, this project is not following the typical process for determining park <br />40 <br />dedication, rather <br />41 <br />paying the full park dedication fee, however, it will be done as a credit against the purchase price <br />42 <br />since the City is buying park land. <br />43 <br />PF15-025_RPCA_120215 <br /> <br />Page 2 of 3 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.