Laserfiche WebLink
iew Committee (DRC) met on November 5 and 12, 2015,to <br />44 <br />discuss this application.The Planning Division commented that the park lot should be changed <br />45 <br />from an outlot to a standard lot and that the applicant should complete a title review to make <br />46 <br />certain no additional easements are indicated on the plat. Both of these recommendations have <br />47 <br />been completed. The City will also require the existing roadway easement for County Road C to <br />48 <br />be dedicated as a component of the platting process. <br />49 <br />PC <br />UBLIC OMMENT <br />50 <br />At the time this report was prepared, Planning Division staff has not received any <br />51 <br />communications from members of the public about the proposed platting. Staff has had <br />52 <br /> <br />discussions with a couple of neighbors regarding design of the site and building placement. <br />53 <br />RA <br />ECOMMENDED CTION <br />54 <br />By motion, recommend approval of the proposed preliminary plat <br />of Applewood Pointe of <br /> <br />55 <br />Roseville at Central Park, generally comprising the property at 934 Woodhill Drive and 2659 <br />56 <br />Victoria Street, based on the comments and findings of this report, and subject to the following <br />57 <br />conditions: <br />58 <br /> <br />a.The Public Works Department shall approve easements, grading and drainage, storm <br />59 <br />water management, and utility requirements as necessary to meet the applicable standards <br />60 <br />prior to the approval of the final plat or issuance of permits for site improvements; <br />61 <br /> <br />b.Permits for site improvements shall not be issued without evidence of an approved permit <br />62 <br />from the watershed district; <br />63 <br /> <br />c.S&S Tree Service shall approve the final tree preservation plan prior to the issuance of a <br />64 <br />building permit. <br />65 <br />AA <br /> <br />LTERNATIVE CTIONS <br />66 <br />Pass a motion to table the item for future action. <br /> Tabling beyond January 18, 2016, may <br />67 <br />require extension of the 60-day action deadline established in City Code §1102.01E <br />68 <br />By motion, recommend denial of the proposal. <br /> A recommendation to deny should be <br />69 <br />supported by specific findings of fact based on the review of the <br />70 <br />. <br />application, applicable City Code regulations, and the public record <br />71 <br />Prepared by: City Planner Thomas Paschke 651-792-7074 | thomas.paschke@cityofroseville.com <br />Attachments: A: Area map Preliminary plat information <br />C: <br />Aerial photo D: Conceptual site plan <br />B: <br />PF15-025_RPCA_120215 <br /> <br />Page 3 of 3 <br /> <br />