My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_01704
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF1000 - PF1999
>
1700-1799
>
pf_01704
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2016 2:12:12 PM
Creation date
1/27/2016 2:23:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
1704
Planning Files - Type
Variance
Address
2545 Hamline Ave N
Project Name
Rosepointe
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
146
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� <br />FF�EDERlCK BEf'JTZ � NIILC7 THOMPSON � ROBERT RIEiO�,% ��!C <br />September 220 1987 <br />MEMORANDUM <br />Re: RosePointe - Phase I <br />Commission Number: 85-31 <br />On Wednesday. September 16� 1987, a meeting was held at the job site <br />to review and discuss the potential to retain existing vegetation <br />along the project's southerr� property line. Those in attendance were: <br />Noward Dahlgren and Dave Janisch. City of Rosevil{e; Jim Johnston� <br />Pointe Development; Tony Christensen, Bor-Son; Chris Mickman and <br />Ellen Dawns� Mickman 6rothers Nurseries; and myself. The following <br />issues were discussed: <br />1. Firstly� we reviewed <br />in question (segment <br />and the NSP easement <br />existing growth and <br />required by the City <br />of the NS� easement <br />the approved landscape plan whereby the area <br />of land be'tween the southern property line <br />line) was shown as being cleared of all <br />replaced with sod. The landscap� sc►-een, <br />�f Rosevills� would occur along and north <br />line. <br />2. After obser�ing this area in the field, it was agreed upon to <br />leave as much+ ofi the existing growth in �lace as possible. <br />However� Howard requ�sted 1-hat areas cont�ining weedy grasses <br />be removed and replaced with sod. The landscape screen will <br />now occur along the edge of existing vegetation. Plant material, <br />sizes and quantities shall remain as originally designed. A <br />revised landscape plan will be submifited for review and approval. <br />3. With this decision� the app�oved grading and drainage plan must <br />also be modified to accommodate the redesign. In lieu of adding <br />fili to the area in questiono the h'sghesi� existing elevation <br />wi01 r�main as i�. D�ainage to th� east will occur naturally <br />and eventually tis into the new storm water pipe and existing <br />storm ��rater drainage system. Drainage to the wost will also <br />occur with existing contQurs. However, since the southwest <br />corner of property is slightly lower than property to the north� <br />a drainage swale will be cut-in to tie the southwest corner into <br />the storm water retention pond sysfiem� 1-hus allowing t�is area <br />to draino A revised grading and drairiage plan will al.�o be sub- <br />mitted to tlie City for review and approval. <br />John Akiba� Jr., AIA <br />JA:njs <br />cc: �loward Dahlgren, City of Roseville <br />��Dave Janisch, City of Roseville. <br />Tony Christensen� Bor-Son Constr,uction <br />Jim Johnston, Pointe Development <br />Chris Mickman, Mickman Brothers Nursery <br />Note: Or� Thursday, September 17� 1987� we met with Dave Janisch to <br />review the revised grading and drainage plan. Dave suggested <br />that we widen the mout� ofi the swale as it connects to the <br />existing contour fio facilitate drainage. With this exception� <br />the revised plan was appproved by the City. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.