My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_01704
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF1000 - PF1999
>
1700-1799
>
pf_01704
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2016 2:12:12 PM
Creation date
1/27/2016 2:23:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
1704
Planning Files - Type
Variance
Address
2545 Hamline Ave N
Project Name
Rosepointe
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
146
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
0 <br />0 <br />CJ <br />� <br />FREDERICK BENTZ � MILO THOMPSON � ROBERT RIET�W INC <br />Mr. 8 Mrs. Clyde McLean <br />February 15, 1988 <br />P�ge Two <br />2. Our design intentions for the landscape wall ne�hesCv�raPlanningtly, <br />we attempted to address concerns you raised i Y <br />meeting held on October 2, 1985. At that time, <br />the City instructed <br />us to provide only one access point into thed�ivewa�dandefree� Your <br />property and to also eventually abandon the Y ro eci'. <br />standing garages located at the southeast corner of the p J <br />You� in turn, expressed concern over that decision and raised <br />questions as to the impact of that traffic flow going past your <br />house. We consequently added return segmentste� �an�dSc�eP�eaWbuffer <br />flanking both sides of i�t�e entry drive to bet p <br />between your house and the drive. <br />Secondiy, after great concern was expressed by both the City and <br />Pointe's marketing staff on the negative appearance of the Forum <br />Apartment and its free-standing garages, a dec��betlerascreenhthe <br />to construct the wall to a height of 6 feet t <br />project from the neighborhood and, in effect� make the existing <br />complex more presentable. <br />You expressed your disagreement with our design and told us that, <br />in your words, we must be asinine for thin{�ing that the (and- <br />scape walf'Icould hic+e the 9oua9feeli�ngshareathatethedo�vera�build- <br />ing was a Berlin Wall . <br />height of the return legs of �debeaableaPo seelove�Uthebwa�educed <br />to such a height that you wou <br />from inside your home. <br />3, We w�n-t on to discuss the facts that the landscape wall is cur- <br />rently in its roughest looking state since final steps such as <br />"washing down" the wall have not been done and that final grad- <br />ing along the landscape wall needs to be done. <br />Steps recently taken in hope that we would be addressing some of <br />your and the City's concerns have been to add additional land- <br />scaping along the Hamline Avenue side of the wall that will <br />crea�re a continuous green hedge along the base of the wall. Ivy <br />has been added to the Forum side of the wall and dogwood hedges <br />have been added behind the pier elements on either side of the <br />main entry drive to give additional landscape detail. <br />We concluded the meeting by informing you that we would review the <br />above with our Client and convey as best we could your feelings on <br />the landscape wall and that we would contact you again ifi our <br />Client wishes to take some action on this matter. <br />0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.